PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Farm and personal characteristics of the clientele of a community-based animal-health service programme in northern Malawi.

Journal:
Tropical animal health and production
Year:
2001
Authors:
Hüttner, K et al.
Affiliation:
Massey University

Plain-English summary

In a study conducted in northern Malawi, researchers looked at the backgrounds and farming situations of 96 users of a community-based animal health service program compared to 96 past users and 96 people who had never used the service. They found that those using the program tended to have larger cattle herds and better crop yields, as well as better living conditions and more household items. Interestingly, the study also revealed that users were more likely to adopt improved farming practices that didn't require spending money, and they generally had higher education levels and felt more knowledgeable about farming. To encourage more farmers to use the program, the researchers suggested that more outreach and education efforts should be made in the villages. Overall, the findings indicate that the program is beneficial, but more work is needed to engage non-users.

Abstract

The social background, farm characteristics, indicators of income and self-evaluation returns of 96 randomly selected users of a Basic Animal Health Service (BAHS) programme in northern Malawi were compared with those of 96 matched past-users and 96 non-users, respectively. All 288 farms were visited between July and October 1997. Data analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate techniques. The results showed that, on average, BAHS users had larger cattle herds (16.3) than part-users (14.7) or non-users (12.4). Similarly, the annual yields of crops were higher for users compared to either of the other groups. Users occupied better houses and owned a larger number of farm and household items than did part-users or non-users. A third of all farmers were engaged in additional income generation to lessen the risk of poverty. However, analysis of the livestock management and the educational background of the farmers suggested that usage of the BAHS programme was not only determined by already existing 'wealth'. Improved livestock husbandry and management measures, which do not require capital investment, were more frequently applied by users compared to either of the other groups. Non-users and part-users had attained a lower level of education, were less open towards improved farming methods and felt less knowledgeable than BAHS users. The average straight-line distances from farms using BAHS to their respective village animal health worker (2.2 km) or veterinary assistant (2.9 km) were similar but varied according to ecological zone. Intensified extension and awareness meetings in villages will be required to get more non-users involved in BAHS.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11360799/