PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Flexible swallowing endoscopy tested safely in awake large dogs

By Marks, Stanley L et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2016·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Feasibility of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in healthy dogs.

Species:
dog
Breathing & coughDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of six healthy large and giant breed dogs underwent a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to see how well they could swallow different types of food. The procedure was done while the dogs were awake, and they drank colored water and ate canned and kibble diets. All dogs tolerated the procedure well, with only mild nosebleeds in two of them, which resolved quickly. The endoscopic evaluation showed that their swallowing function was normal, making this method a promising tool for assessing swallowing issues in dogs.

People also search for: dog swallowing problems · endoscopy for dogs · why is my dog coughing after eating

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in awake dogs, determine whether specific variables associated with the oropharyngeal phase of swallowing can be recognized, and evaluate the safety and tolerability of FEES. ANIMALS: 6 healthy client-owned large- and giant-breed adult dogs. PROCEDURES: A topical anesthetic was applied to the nasal passage of each dog, and a fiberoptic endoscope was passed transnasally until the tip of the scope was positioned in the oropharynx. All dogs voluntarily drank colored water followed by consumption of a commercial canned diet and then a kibble diet mixed with food color. During each swallow, laryngeal and pharyngeal anatomic structures were evaluated and depth of bolus flow prior to the pharyngeal phase of swallowing was assessed. Evidence of bolus retention in the vallecula or pyriform sinuses and laryngeal penetration of the bolus were recorded. RESULTS: FEES was completed without major adverse events and was tolerated well by all 6 dogs. Mild, self-limiting epistaxis was noted for 2 dogs. The nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were observed in all dogs; movement of food boluses through the esophagus was observed in 2 dogs, and food boluses in the stomach were visible in 1 dog. Pharyngeal and laryngeal function was considered physiologically normal in all dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: FEES appeared to be a feasible diagnostic tool for use in large- and giant-breed dogs. Studies are warranted in dogs with oropharyngeal dysphagia to determine whether FEES can be tolerated and whether it can augment videofluoroscopy findings.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26919601/