Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Fecal bile acid changes in dogs with chronic liver disease
By Verena Habermaass et al.·Published in Animals·2024·Department of Veterinary Sciences, Veterinary Teaching Hospital “Mario Modenato”, University of Pisa, Via Livornese Lato Monte, San Piero a Grado, 56122 Pisa, Italy, CH·View original on DOAJ →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Fecal Bile Acids in Canine Chronic Liver Disease: Results from 46 Dogs
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 46 dogs with chronic liver disease (CLD) had their feces tested for bile acids to see how it related to their symptoms. Dogs with biliary tract involvement (BTD) showed higher levels of certain bile acids and were more likely to have gastrointestinal issues, including diarrhea. This suggests that bile acid metabolism might be disrupted in these dogs, potentially leading to their symptoms. Understanding these changes could help veterinarians better manage liver disease in dogs.
People also search for: dog chronic liver disease symptoms · dog diarrhea treatment · bile acids in dogs
Abstract
The concentrations of fecal and serum bile acids (BAs) are known to be altered in human patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs), especially those with biliary tract involvement (BTD). Scarce literature is available regarding fecal BA modifications during canine CLDs. This study aimed to evaluate fecal BAs in canine CLDs according to different clinical and clinicopathological variables. Forty-six dogs were enrolled. Canine feces were analyzed by HPLC. Cholic Acid (CA), Chenodeoxycholic Acid (CDCA), Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA), Deoxycholic Acid (DCA), and Lithocholic Acid (LCA) were measured, and primary BAs (CA + CDCA), secondary BAs (UDCA + DCA + LCA), and the primary/secondary (P/S) ratio were calculated. Primary BAs (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), CA (<i>p</i> = 0.0003), CDCA (<i>p</i> = 0.003), the P/S ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and total BAs (<i>p</i> = 0.005) were significatively higher in BTD dogs (n = 18) compared to in non-BTD dogs (n = 28). Fecal secondary BAs did not statistically differ between BTD and non-BTD dogs. Gastrointestinal clinical signs (<i>p</i> = 0.028) and diarrhea (<i>p</i> = 0.03) were significantly more prevalent in BTD dogs compared to in non-BTD dogs, supporting the hypothesis of some pathological mechanisms assimilable to bile acid diarrhea (BAD). Our results could reflect imbalances of the fecal BA metabolism in dogs with CLDs. Further studies involving gut microbiome and metabolomic assessment are needed to better understand the possible clinical implications of BA metabolism disruption and their potential role in canine CLDs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213051