PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How raw meat and kibble diets affect dogs' gut and blood markers

By Hiney, Kris et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2024·Department of Animal and Food Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Fecal microbiota composition, serum metabolomics, and markers of inflammation in dogs fed a raw meat-based diet compared to those on a kibble diet.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at healthy dogs on either a raw meat-based diet or a kibble diet to see how their gut bacteria and inflammation levels were affected. The results showed that the gut bacteria were different between the two groups, with the raw meat diet leading to higher levels of certain local inflammatory markers. However, both diets had similar effects on overall inflammation in the body. This suggests that while raw diets might change gut health, they don't necessarily lead to more inflammation throughout the body. More research is needed to understand the long-term health effects of these diets.

People also search for: dog raw meat diet benefits · kibble vs raw diet for dogs · dog gut health and inflammation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the potential health risks associated with feeding raw and non-traditional diets, the use of these diets in dogs is increasing, yet the health outcomes associated with these diets is not well understood. This study investigates the effect of feeding dogs a kibble or raw meat-based diets on fecal microbiota composition, serum metabolomics and inflammatory markers. METHODS: Clinically healthy dogs with a history of consuming either kibble (KD, = 27) or raw meat-based diets (RMBD, = 28) for more than 1 year were enrolled. Dogs were fed a standardized diet of either a single brand of KD or RMBD for 28 days. Serum and fecal samples were collected for analysis of microbiota, metabolomics, and inflammatory markers. Multiple regression analysis was performed for each of the metabolites and inflammatory markers, with feed group, age and BCS included as independent variables. RESULTS: The fecal microbiota composition differed between the KD and RMBD groups. Beta-diversity and some indices of alpha-diversity (i.e., Shannon and Simpson) were different between the two diet groups. Sixty- three serum metabolites differed between KD and RMBD-fed dogs with the majority reflecting the differences in macronutrient composition of the two diets.Fecal IAP, IgG and IgA were significantly higher in RMBD dogs compared to KD dogs, while systemic markers of inflammation, including serum c-reactive protein (CRP), galectin, secretory receptor of advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE), haptoglobin, and serum IgG were similar in dogs fed either diet. DISCUSSION: Diet composition significantly affected fecal microbiota composition and metabolome. Although it had a potentially beneficial effect on local inflammatory markers, feeding RMBD had no impact on systemic inflammation. The influence of these changes on long term health outcomes provides an area for future study.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38694479/