PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Long-term femur bone changes after dog hip replacement surgery

By Bergh, Mary Sarah et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2004·Department of Surgical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Femoral bone adaptation to stable long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs.

Species:
dog
Hip dysplasiaMovement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 14 older dogs that had undergone stable total hip replacement surgery were studied to see how their bones adapted over time. After an average of about 5 years with the implants, researchers found that the bone structure around the implant changed significantly. The bone near the implant became less dense, while the bone further away increased in density. This suggests that the way the bone responds to the implant can affect its stability and may indicate potential issues in the future.

People also search for: dog hip replacement recovery · signs of hip implant problems in dogs · total hip arthroplasty in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify long-term bone adaptation after stable cemented total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical study. ANIMALS: Fourteen dogs. METHODS: Femoral specimens were collected from client-owned dogs that were donated after death because of causes unrelated to their cTHA. Mean (+/-SEM) dog age was 11.4+/-0.7 years and implant duration was 5.3+/-0.7 years. Implant stability was established from radiographic signs and gross mechanical stability. Femurs were evaluated at 3 levels based on implant length: proximal stem (PS), mid-stem (MS), and distal to stem (DS). Cortical area, medullary area, and porosity were measured at each level. Implanted femurs were compared to contralateral nonimplanted femurs. RESULTS: Cortical area and cortical porosity were significantly increased in implanted femurs compared to nonimplanted femurs. Cortical area was increased at the MS and DS levels, and porosity was increased at the PS and MS levels in implanted femurs. Porosity was greatest in the endosteal region at the PS and MS levels in implanted femurs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in femoral geometry and cortical porosity were detected after long-term stable cTHA. Net bone loss proximally and increased bone mass distally support stress shielding as a important mechanical factor associated with bone adaptation. Distribution of porosity shifts to endosteal regions after long-term cTHA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Significant site-specific femoral adaptation occurs in response to stable cTHA and may precede implant loosening.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15104627/