Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Force plate gait analysis detects mild hindlimb lameness in dogs
By Voss, K et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2007·Clinic for Small Animal Surgery·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Force plate gait analysis at the walk and trot in dogs with low-grade hindlimb lameness.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with low-grade hindlimb lameness, often due to hip or knee joint issues, was evaluated using a special force plate to measure their walking and trotting. The results showed that trotting provided a more accurate assessment of their lameness compared to walking. Specifically, the trot had a high sensitivity and specificity, meaning it was better at identifying which dogs were truly lame. This suggests that if your dog is limping, having them trot during a vet visit could give a clearer picture of their condition.
People also search for: dog limping treatment · how to assess dog lameness · dog hip joint problems · force plate analysis for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of force plate gait analysis at the walk and trot in dogs with low-grade hindlimb lameness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nineteen healthy dogs and 41 dogs with low-grade unilateral hindlimb lameness due to stifle or hip joint problems were walked and trotted over a force plate. Peak vertical forces (PVF) were recorded, and a symmetry index (SI) was calculated from the PVF of the hindlimbs. 'Cut-off' values were determined from the SI of the normal dogs. These cut-off values were used to discriminate lame dogs from normal ones. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for measurements at walk and trot, and the Cohen's Kappa coefficient (k) was used to determine the agreement between clinical lameness and force plate measurements, and between force plate results at walk and trot. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve were plotted for both gaits to evaluate accuracy. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the measurements at walk was 0.63, and specifity was 0.95. The sensitivity of the measurements at trot was 0.90, and specificity was 1.0. Moderate agreement was found between force plate measurements at walk and trot, and between clinical gait assessment and force plate measurements at walk. Good agreement was found between clinical gait assessment and measurements at trot. ROC analyses revealed the trot (94.7% [91.7%; 97.7%]) to be the more accurate test than the walk (85.0% [80.1%; 89.9%]). CONCLUSION: The trotting gait was more sensitive and accurate than the walking gait for the differentiation of dogs with a low-grade hindlimb lameness from normal ones using force plate gait analysis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18038008/