PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Frozen-thawed cell sheets from dog fat cells help bone fracture

By Yoon, Yongseok et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary science·2019·Research Institute for Veterinary Science and College of Veterinary Medicine, South Korea·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Frozen-thawed gelatin-induced osteogenic cell sheets of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells improved fracture healing in canine model.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of six dogs with broken front legs received special treatments to help their bones heal. The dogs were divided into three groups: one group got fresh cell sheets made from fat cells, another group received frozen-thawed cell sheets, and the last group was a control with no special treatment. After eight weeks, the dogs treated with either type of cell sheet showed better bone healing compared to the control group, with more organized and mature bone at the fracture site. This suggests that both fresh and frozen-thawed cell sheets can effectively support bone healing in dogs.

People also search for: dog broken leg treatment · canine bone healing · fat cell therapy for dogs

Abstract

We assessed the efficacy of frozen-thawed gelatin-induced osteogenic cell sheet (FT-GCS) compared to that of fresh gelatin-induced osteogenic cell sheet (F-GCS) with adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (Ad-MSCs) used as the control. The bone differentiation capacity of GCS has already been studied. On that basis, the experiment was conducted to determine ease of use of GCS in the clinic.evaluation of F-GCS showed 3-4 layers with an abundant extracellular matrix (ECM) formation; however, cryopreservation resulted in a reduction of FT-GCS layers to 2-3 layers. Cellular viabilities of F-GCS and FT-GCS did not vary significantly. Moreover, there was no significant difference in mRNA expressions of Runx2, &#x3b2;-catenin, OPN, and BMP-7 between F-GCS and FT-GCS. In anexperiment, both legs of six dogs with transverse radial fractures were randomly assigned to one of three groups: F-GCS, FT-GCS, or control. Fracture sites were wrapped with the respective cell sheets and fixed with 2.7 mm locking plates and six screws. At 8 weeks after the operations, bone samples were collected and subjected to micro computed tomography and histopathological examination. External volumes of callus as a portion of the total bone volume in control, F-GCS, and FT-GCS groups were 49.6%, 45.3%, and 41.9%, respectively. The histopathological assessment showed that both F-GCS and FT-GCS groups exhibited significantly (< 0.05) well-organized, mature bone with peripheral cartilage at the fracture site compared to that of the control group. Based on our results, we infer that the cryopreservation process did not significantly affect the osteogenic ability of gelatin-induced cell sheets.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31775190/