Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Long-term walking force changes after partial vs full wrist fusion
By Andreoni, A A et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2010·Vetsuisse Faculty·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Ground reaction force profiles after partial and pancarpal arthrodesis in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 14 dogs that had surgery to fuse their wrist joints (either partial or full fusion) were evaluated to see how well they moved afterward. The study found that both types of surgery led to good long-term outcomes, with dogs showing some differences in how they used their legs compared to healthy dogs. While both groups had reduced movement forces, those with full wrist fusion had more noticeable changes in their ability to push off the ground. Overall, dogs recovered well from the surgeries and were able to function effectively.
People also search for: dog wrist surgery recovery · partial carpal arthrodesis outcome · pancarpal arthrodesis for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare long-term functional outcome after partial carpal arthrodesis and pancarpal arthrodesis in dogs using kinetic gait analysis. METHODS: Fourteen dogs with 19 partial carpal or pancarpal arthrodeses were retrospectively examined and underwent force-plate gait analysis. Mean times since surgery were 29.4 and 24.4 months for pancarpal and partial carpal arthrodesis respectively. Vertical and braking-propulsive ground reaction force profiles were compared between treatment groups, and to those of normal dogs (control group) using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: With the exception of time to vertical peak that occurred earlier in dogs with pancarpal than in dogs with partial carpal arthrodesis (p <0.01), there was no difference between the two treatment groups. Several parameters differed significantly between operated and healthy dogs (p <0.01): vertical impulses were significantly lower in both treatment groups, braking forces and impulses were also reduced after both techniques. Propulsive forces and impulses were only reduced in dogs with pancarpal arthrodesis. When comparing gait parameters of sound limbs of unilateral operated dogs to those of control dogs, braking forces and impulses (p <0.01; p <0.05) were significantly higher in the sound legs of unilateral operated dogs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Long-term outcome after partial carpal and pancarpal arthrodesis is good and comparable to each other. Propulsive action may be altered more in dogs with pancarpal arthrodesis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19997672/