Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Guided tissue regeneration with rigid absorbable membranes for dog
By Reis, Emily Correna Carlo et al.·Published in Acta odontologica Scandinavica·2013·Departamento de Veteriná, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Guided tissue regeneration using rigid absorbable membranes in the dog model of chronic furcation defect.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study involving dogs with chronic gum disease tested new rigid absorbable membranes to help heal periodontal defects. These membranes were designed to prevent collapsing into the defect but were found to expose themselves shortly after surgery, which hindered healing. While some bone and tissue regeneration occurred, it was limited due to contamination at the wound site. Ultimately, the membranes did not significantly improve the healing of these gum defects in the dogs.
People also search for: dog gum disease treatment · periodontal disease in dogs · dog tooth extraction recovery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Absorbable membranes are used to promote the regeneration of periodontal defects by Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR). However, their collapse into the defect is commonly reported, impairing regeneration. Therefore, absorbable but rigid membranes aiming at preventing such collapse were developed and analyzed in periodontal regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Membranes were analyzed in class II furcation defects in dogs; procedures included periodontal disease induction, prophylaxis and GTR (treated groups) or open flap debridement alone (control group). For GTR, the membranes were made of either 25% hydroxyapatite (HA) in polyhydroxybutyrate matrix (PHB) or 35% HA in PHB. Animals were clinically evaluated for gingival recession, clinical attachment level (CAL) and biopsies were collected at 60 and 120 days. Bone volume, trabeculae number, trabecular thickness and trabecular separation were quantified by micro-computed tomography, followed by histology. RESULTS: Membrane exposure was observed in both treated groups (25 and 35% HAP) from the 8(th) day after surgery, continuously progressing until 120 days. Mean CAL for all groups remained above normal values for dogs. Bone volumetric values were not significantly different. Partial formation of bone, cementum and periodontal ligament was observed in treated groups. An inflammatory infiltrate was observed in the dense connective tissue that partially filled the center of the treated defects with active osteoclasts on bone surface. CONCLUSION: Although partial regeneration of the defect was observed, it was limited by wound contamination. Consequently, rigid absorbable membranes made of HA and PHB failed to improve the regeneration of class II furcation defects in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22587413/