PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Blood clotting problems in horses with colic and what they mean

By JOHNSTONE, I. B. & CRANE, S.·Published in Equine Veterinary Journal·1986·View original on Crossref

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Haemostatic abnormalities in horses with colic — Their prognostic value

Species:
horse

Plain-English summary

A group of 24 adult horses, including Thoroughbreds and Standardbreds, was examined for bleeding issues after showing signs of colic (abdominal pain). Tests revealed that all horses had at least one abnormal blood clotting measurement, with many showing significant issues like prolonged clotting times and low platelet counts. Horses that did not survive had more severe abnormalities compared to those that did, indicating that certain blood tests could help predict outcomes in colic cases. The findings suggest that monitoring specific clotting factors could be crucial for assessing the prognosis of horses with colic.

People also search for: horse colic symptoms · horse bleeding problems · colic prognosis in horses · horse blood tests for colic · what to do for a horse with colic

Abstract

Summary The incidence and nature of coagulation abnormalities in horses presented with colic and the possible prognostic value of these abnormalities was investigated. A coagulogram was performed on each of 24 adult Thoroughbred or Standardbred horses. A coagulogram consisted of measurements of eight parameters; platelet count, plasma fibrinogen, plasma antithrombin III (AT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), prothrombin time (PT), thrombin clotting time (TCT), soluble fibrin monomer (SFM) and fibrin‐fibrinogen degradation products (FDP). Retrospective determination of the cause of the colic and outcome (survival vs non‐survival) was carried out. All patients examined had at least one abnormal parameter with the frequency being: Increased SFM 67 per cent; prolonged PTT 63 per cent; prolonged TCT 50 per cent; elevated plasma fibrinogen 46 per cent; reduced platelet count 29 per cent; reduced plasma AT 29 per cent; prolonged PT 25 per cent; and elevated serum FDP 21 per cent. When survivor and non‐survivor groups were compared there was little difference in the frequency of abnormalities such as elevated SFM, elevated fibrinogen and prolonged PTT. The abnormalities which had the greatest frequency difference between non‐survivors and survivors, and therefore the greatest prognostic value, were decreased AT > prolonged TCT = prolonged PT > elevated FDP > reduced platelet count. The frequency of these abnormalities in non‐survivors compared to survivors was 8.6:1, 7.1:1, 5.7:1 and 3.6:1, respectively. The average number of abnormal parameters in non‐survivors (five) was significantly greater than in survivors (two).

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1986.tb03624.x