Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Heated IV fluids alone don't stop low body temp in anesthetized cats
By Jourdan, Geraldine et al.Β·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgeryΒ·2017Β·Department of Critical Care - Anesthesia, FranceΒ·View original on PubMed β
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research β every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work β
Original publication title: Heated intravenous fluids alone fail to prevent hypothermia in cats under general anaesthesia.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of female cats undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were given either room temperature or heated intravenous fluids to see if it would help keep them warm during the procedure. Unfortunately, both groups experienced a significant drop in body temperature, with no real difference between those receiving heated fluids and those receiving room temperature fluids. The study suggests that simply using heated fluids at a low rate may not be enough to prevent hypothermia in cats during surgery. This means that veterinarians may need to consider additional warming methods to keep cats comfortable and safe while under anesthesia.
Abstract
Objectives The objective was to evaluate the clinical efficiacy of a constant rate infusion of heated fluid as the sole means of preventing intraoperative hypothermia in cats. Methods This randomised, prospective, clinical study was conducted at a university teaching veterinary hospital. Female cats (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] grade I) undergoing elective surgery by laparotomy under general anaesthesia (acepromazine 0.05 mg/kg SC; morphine 0.2 mg/kg IV; propofol IV titrated, isoflurane 2% in 100% oxygen) were randomised in two groups. Both groups were infused with fluid (NaCl 0.9%, 5 ml/kg/h) either at room temperature (control group) or prewarmed at 43°C (warmed group) using an Astoflo Plus eco (Stihler Electronic) fluid heating device. No other heating device was used. Temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpOwere evaluated after induction (T0) and every 15 mins for 1 h (T15, T30, T45, T60). Mean arterial blood pressure was recorded every 30 mins (T0, T30 and T60). Results Thirty-four female cats (ASA grade I) were enrolled in the study. There was no difference in age, weight, propofol dose or room temperature (22.4 ± 1.1°C vs 22.0 ± 1.5°C; P = 0.363) between control and warmed groups, respectively. In both groups, oesophageal temperature significantly decreased during anaesthesia ( P <0.0001). The temperature decrease after 1 h was -3.6 ± 0.7°C in the warmed group and was not significantly different from the control group (-3.4 ± 0.7°C; P = 0.307). The slopes of the temperature decrease did not significantly differ between the two groups (-0.058 ± 0.013°C/min vs -0.060 ± 0.010°C/min for the control and warmed groups, respectively; P = 0.624). Conclusions and relevance This study provides clinical evidence that a constant rate infusion of heated fluid alone fails to prevent intraoperative hypothermia in cats. The low infusion rate (5 ml/kg/h) could partly explain the ineffectiveness of this active warming device in minimising or delaying the onset of intraoperative hypothermia.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases βOriginal publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28121211/