PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Heart and blood flow effects of acepromazine vs dexmedetomidine

By Grasso, Stefania C et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2015·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Hemodynamic influence of acepromazine or dexmedetomidine premedication in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Six healthy adult dogs were given either acepromazine or dexmedetomidine before undergoing anesthesia with propofol and isoflurane. The study found that dexmedetomidine caused a drop in heart output but helped prevent low blood pressure during anesthesia, while acepromazine led to persistent low blood pressure but maintained heart output. Overall, dogs that received dexmedetomidine had better oxygen levels compared to those that received acepromazine. This suggests that dexmedetomidine may be a better choice for pre-anesthetic medication in dogs to help manage blood pressure during surgery.

People also search for: dog anesthesia side effects · acepromazine vs dexmedetomidine for dogs · dog heart rate during anesthesia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate hemodynamic effects of acepromazine and dexmedetomidine premedication in dogs undergoing general anesthesia induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen and assess the influence of these drugs on oxygen-carrying capacity and PCV. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized crossover study. ANIMALS: 6 healthy adult dogs. PROCEDURES: Dogs received acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg [0.023 mg/lb]) or dexmedetomidine (15.0 μg/kg [6.82 μg/lb]) IM. Fifteen minutes later, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained at end-tidal isoflurane concentration of 1.28% (1 minimum alveolar concentration) for 30 minutes. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at predetermined times. The experiment was repeated 48 hours later with the alternate premedication. Results were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA with a mixed-models procedure. RESULTS: Bradycardia, hypertension, and significant cardiac output (CO) reduction developed after dexmedetomidine premedication but improved during isoflurane anesthesia. Hypotension developed after acepromazine administration and persisted throughout the isoflurane maintenance period, but CO was maintained throughout the anesthetic period when dogs received this treatment. Oxygen delivery and consumption were not different between treatments at most time points, whereas arterial oxygen content was lower with acepromazine premedication owing to lower PCV during isoflurane anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Acepromazine exacerbated hypotension, but CO did not change in dogs anesthetized with propofol and isoflurane. Dexmedetomidine reduced CO but prevented propofol-isoflurane-induced hypotension. In general, oxygen-carrying capacity and PCV were higher in dexmedetomidine-treated than in acepromazine-treated dogs anesthetized with propofol and isoflurane.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25794125/