Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
High-flow nasal oxygen helps dogs with low blood oxygen after other
By Frischer, Robert et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2022·1MedVet New Orleans·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: High-flow nasal cannula improves hypoxemia in dogs failing conventional oxygen therapy.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 dogs with low oxygen levels that weren't improving with regular oxygen therapy were given a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to see if it would help. After starting HFNC, the dogs showed significant improvements in their oxygen levels and breathing rates, with most feeling better overall. While some dogs still needed more intensive care, nine of them were able to go home after treatment. HFNC proved to be a well-tolerated and effective option for dogs struggling with low oxygen.
People also search for: dog breathing problems treatment · hypoxemia in dogs · high-flow nasal cannula for dogs · oxygen therapy for dogs · dog respiratory failure care
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A prospective clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in dogs with hypoxemia. ANIMALS: 20 client-owned dogs failing conventional oxygen therapy (COT). PROCEDURES: Patients admitted to the ICU for treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure were enrolled in the study. PaO2, SPO2, respiratory rate (RR), and acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation scores were obtained at the time of COT failure and after initiation of HFNC. Complications and patient tolerance while receiving HFNC were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared to COT, the median PaO2 and SO2 were significantly higher when dogs were receiving HFNC (60.8 vs 135.6 mm Hg and 90.7% vs 99.25%, respectively). Dogs receiving HFNC had a significant reduction in median RR as compared to dogs undergoing COT (52 vs 36 breaths per minute). After the initiation of HFNC, all dogs showed clinical improvement as measured by PaO2, SO2, and RR. Of 20 dogs, 6 ultimately failed HFNC and mechanical ventilation was recommended. Nine dogs undergoing HFNC survived to discharge, and acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation scores had a significant positive severity correlation with death. Complications included pneumothorax in 1 dog. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: COT has limited flow rates due to airway irritation caused by room temperature, nonhumidified oxygen. HFNC uses vapor humidification and heated oxygen, allowing for higher flow rates. In people, HFNC is used as escalation of oxygen therapy when COT fails. Dogs treated with HFNC had significant improvements in PaO2, SO2, and RR as compared to COT. HFNC is well tolerated and effective in treating hypoxemia in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36322486/