Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
High-frequency electroporation treatment for liver cancer in dogs
By Partridge, Brittanie R et al.·Published in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2020·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation for Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer: A Proof-of-Principle Study in Canine Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A 7-year-old dog with liver cancer underwent a new treatment called high-frequency irreversible electroporation (HFIRE) to target the tumor. This procedure was done without causing significant side effects, and it effectively destroyed a predictable volume of the cancerous tissue. After treatment, the dog's liver showed signs of a healthy immune response, indicating that the body was reacting to the cancer. While this was a small study, the results suggest that HFIRE could be a promising option for dogs with liver tumors that can't be surgically removed.
People also search for: dog liver cancer treatment · HFIRE for canine hepatocellular carcinoma · dog liver tumor symptoms
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of percutaneous high-frequency irreversible electroporation (HFIRE) for primary liver cancer and evaluate the HFIRE-induced local immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HFIRE therapy was delivered percutaneously in 3 canine patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the absence of intraoperative paralytic agents or cardiac synchronization. Pre- and post-HFIRE biopsy samples were processed with histopathology and immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD79a. Blood was collected on days 0, 2, and 4 for complete blood count and chemistry. Numeric models were developed to determine the treatment-specific lethal thresholds for malignant canine liver tissue and healthy porcine liver tissue. RESULTS: HFIRE resulted in predictable ablation volumes as assessed by posttreatment CT. No detectable cardiac interference and minimal muscle contraction occurred during HFIRE. No clinically significant adverse events occurred secondary to HFIRE. Microscopically, a well-defined ablation zone surrounded by a reactive zone was evident in the majority of samples. This zone was composed primarily of maturing collagen interspersed with CD3/CD4/CD8lymphocytes in a proinflammatory microenvironment. The average ablation volumes for the canine HCC patients and the healthy porcine tissue were 3.89 cm± 0.74 and 1.56 cm± 0.16, respectively (P = .03), and the respective average lethal thresholds were 710 V/cm ± 28.2 and 957 V/cm ± 24.4 V/cm (P = .0004). CONCLUSIONS: HFIRE can safely and effectively be delivered percutaneously, results in a predictable ablation volume, and is associated with lymphocytic tumor infiltration. This is the first step toward the use of HFIRE for treatment of unresectable liver tumors.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31956003/