Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Radiofrequency nerve therapy effects on pain nerves in dogs
By Boesch, Jordyn M et al.·Published in Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2019·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Histological, electrophysiological and clinical effects of thermal radiofrequency therapy of the saphenous nerve and pulsed radiofrequency therapy of the sciatic nerve in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of six young Beagle dogs with severe knee pain from osteoarthritis underwent a new treatment involving thermal radiofrequency therapy on the saphenous nerve and pulsed radiofrequency therapy on the sciatic nerve. The goal was to see if these therapies could relieve pain without causing nerve damage. After the treatment, some dogs showed signs of nerve degeneration, but they did not experience any pain or movement problems afterward. Further studies are needed to confirm if this combined approach can effectively reduce pain without affecting movement in dogs with knee arthritis.
People also search for: dog knee pain treatment · Beagle osteoarthritis therapy · thermal radiofrequency for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Thermal radiofrequency (TRF) of the saphenous nerve (a sensory nerve) combined with pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the sciatic nerve (a sensory and motor nerve) might relieve intractable stifle osteoarthritis (OA) pain in dogs. The objective was to determine if saphenous nerve TRF induces Wallerian degeneration and if sciatic nerve PRF induces degeneration or dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded, controlled, randomized, preclinical study. ANIMALS: A group of six intact, female Beagle dogs aged 14-16 months. METHODS: In each dog, one pelvic limb was assigned randomly to the control group and the other to the treatment group. Dogs were anesthetized and, using ultrasonography, radiofrequency electrodes were positioned adjacent to saphenous and sciatic nerves bilaterally; TRF and PRF were performed only in the treatment limb. Motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) was measured in both sciatic nerves 2 weeks later, and the dogs were euthanized. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of saphenous and sciatic nerves were examined using light microscopy. Degeneration and inflammation were scored 0 (none) to 3 (severe). A one-tailed, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for differences in scores and MNCV between control and treatment nerves. RESULTS: Degeneration and inflammation scores were higher in treatment saphenous nerves in 5/6 dogs [83%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 36%, 99%]; however, after Bonferroni correction only degeneration score was higher (p = 0.0313). Degeneration, inflammation or decreased MNCV were not observed in sciatic nerves (each outcome: 0/6 nerves, 0%; 95% CI, 0%, 48%). No dogs experienced postprocedural pain or neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The degeneration in TRF-treated saphenous nerves appears sufficient to impair transmission. Sciatic nerve PRF did not cause degeneration with attendant motor deficits, consistent with a proposed neuromodulatory mechanism. A clinical trial is needed to confirm the combined techniques produce analgesia without motor deficits in dogs with stifle OA.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31358392/