PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Holter heart monitoring in dogs for 24 hours versus 48 hours

By Mavropoulou, A et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2021·Davies Veterinary Specialists, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Holter monitoring in dogs: 24 h vs. 48 h.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A dog with heart disease showing signs like weakness, collapsing, or trouble exercising may benefit from a Holter monitor, which records the heart's activity over time. This study found that extending the monitoring from 24 hours to 48 hours can help catch more heart rhythm issues, particularly in dogs with certain types of arrhythmias. The extra day of monitoring increased the chances of detecting a problem from 32% to nearly 47%. While the additional time was especially helpful for some arrhythmias, it was less beneficial for others.

People also search for: dog heart disease symptoms · Holter monitor for dogs · dog weakness and collapse · arrhythmia treatment in dogs

Abstract

Holter monitoring has an important role in the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias in dogs with underlying heart disease or clinical signs such as intermittent weakness/ collapse or exercise intolerance, and in the assessment of antiarrhythmic treatment efficacy. A typical recording lasts for 24 h, although 48 h or any number of days up to 7 are possible, especially when investigating clinical signs that may not happen during the first 24 h. The objective of this study was to review retrospectively a large number of 48 h Holter recordings obtained from dogs to assess the possible incremental diagnostic yield of the second 24 h period in comparison to the first 24 h. Three hundred and fifty four 48 h Holter recordings were included in the study for analysis. A 48 h Holter recording contributed to a 14.5% increase in the likelihood of documenting the cardiac rhythm during an event of interest; a 24 h recording increased the diagnostic yield from 32.2% to 46.7%. When the recordings were grouped according to the most important rhythm abnormalities (supraventricular arrhythmias group, ventricular arrhythmias group, bradyarrhythmias group, no arrhythmias group), the 48 h Holter monitor contributed to a 5% increase in the likelihood of identifying a relevant cardiac rhythm abnormality, increasing the diagnostic yield from 58% to 63%. This benefit occurred mostly in dogs with iterative or paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmias. In dogs with bradyarrhythmias or ventricular arrhythmias, an additional 24 h of analysis was useful in only a limited number of cases.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33941329/