PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Rickettsia felis bacteria found in blood of US cats and dogs

By Hoque, Md Monirul et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2020·Department of Pathobiology, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Identification of Rickettsia felis DNA in the blood of domestic cats and dogs in the USA.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A study found very low levels of Rickettsia felis DNA, a bacteria linked to flea-borne spotted fever, in the blood of a few domestic cats and dogs in the USA. Specifically, 4 out of 752 cats and 3 out of 777 dogs tested positive, indicating that these pets are unlikely to be significant carriers of the bacteria. The researchers concluded that the low prevalence suggests that R. felis is not a common cause of illness in these animals. This means pet owners can feel reassured that their cats and dogs are not major reservoirs for this pathogen.

People also search for: "cat flea disease symptoms" · "dog flea-borne illness" · "Rickettsia felis in pets"

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main vector and reservoir host of Rickettsia felis, an emerging human pathogen causing flea-borne spotted fever, is the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis. While cats have not been found to be infected with the organism, significant percentages of dogs from Australia and Africa are infected, indicating that they may be important mammalian reservoirs. The objective of this study was to determine the presence of R. felis DNA in the blood of domestic dogs and cats in the USA. METHODS: Three previously validated PCR assays for R. felis and DNA sequencing were performed on blood samples obtained from clinically ill domestic cats and dogs from 45 states (2008-2020) in the USA. The blood samples had been submitted for the diagnosis of various tick-borne diseases in dogs and feline infectious peritonitis virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, and Bartonella spp. in cats. Phylogenetic comparisons were performed on the gltA nucleotide sequences obtained in the study and those reported for R. felis and R. felis-like organisms. RESULTS: Low copy numbers of R. felis DNA (around 100 copies/ml whole blood) were found in four cats (4/752, 0.53%) and three dogs (3/777, 0.39%). The very low levels of infection in clinically ill animals is consistent with R. felis being an unlikely cause of disease in naturally infected dogs and cats. The low copy numbers we found emphasize the requirement for very sensitive PCRs in prevalence studies. CONCLUSIONS: The low prevalence of naturally infected PCR-positive cats is further evidence that cats are unlikely to be important reservoirs of R. felis. Similarly, the low prevalence in dogs suggests they are not important reservoirs in the USA. Investigations should continue into the role other mammalian species may be playing in the epidemiology of R. felis infections.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33208186/