Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Effectiveness of canine enteric coronavirus vaccines against diarrhea
By Leung, Char et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2026·1Leicester Medical School, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of canine enteric coronavirus vaccine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs vaccinated against canine enteric coronavirus (CECoV) showed a significant reduction in diarrhea, which is a common symptom of this virus. The study found that inactivated vaccines were effective in boosting the dogs' immune response, while attenuated vaccines helped but were less effective. However, the vaccines did not significantly reduce the amount of virus shed by the dogs, which could make it harder to control outbreaks in places like kennels and shelters. Overall, while the vaccines can help prevent diarrhea, their limited effectiveness in controlling viral shedding raises concerns about their use in communal settings.
People also search for: dog diarrhea vaccine · canine enteric coronavirus symptoms · CECoV vaccine effectiveness
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine enteric coronavirus (CECoV) causes diarrhea and vomiting, often leading to outbreaks in kennels and shelters. The World Small Animal Veterinary Association does not recommend vaccination due to limited evidence of efficacy. This meta-analysis assesses CECoV vaccine immunogenicity and protective efficacy against diarrhea and viral shedding. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for experimental or observational studies of dogs vaccinated against CECoV, published from inception to September 29, 2025. Included studies confirmed dogs were free of CECoV infection and neutralizing antibodies before study. Exclusions applied to noncompliant studies. The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation and funnel plots assessed bias risk. To assess vaccine immunogenicity, ELISA optical density (OD) values and log2 virus neutralization (VN) titers were regressed; pooled risk ratios evaluated protective efficacy. RESULTS: From 415 studies, 5 experimental studies with unclear bias risks were included. Most reported dog age but omitted sex or breed. Inactivated vaccines significantly increased both OD values and VN titers, whereas attenuated vaccines significantly increased OD values but not VN titers. Vaccination reduced diarrhea risk by 72% (risk ratio, -1.28; 95% CI, -2.05 to -0.51), but did not decrease viral shedding (risk ratio, -0.25; 95% CI, -0.70 to 0.21). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CECoV vaccines are immunogenic and reduce diarrhea, but do not significantly reduce viral shedding, potentially masking infections in clinical settings and thus complicating disease control in communal environments. Limited literature and studies from similar research groups suggest removing CECoV vaccines from guidelines. Standardized reporting is recommended to improve future canine epidemiological research reliability.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41349216/