PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Oral rabies vaccine response in local Bali dogs

By Megawati Saputra, Irene Linda et al.·Published in Viruses·2023·Directorate of Animal Health·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Immunogenicity of Oral Rabies Vaccine Strain SPBN GASGAS in Local Dogs in Bali, Indonesia.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of local dogs in Bali received an oral rabies vaccine either directly or through a tasty egg-flavored bait to help protect them from rabies, a serious disease that is common in the area. After vaccination, blood tests showed that nearly all the dogs developed a strong immune response, similar to those that received a traditional injection. This means that the oral vaccine is just as effective as the standard shot in providing protection against rabies. This approach could help vaccinate more dogs in areas where they roam freely and are hard to catch for shots.

People also search for: dog rabies vaccine effectiveness · oral rabies vaccine for dogs · Bali dog vaccination program

Abstract

Dog-mediated rabies is endemic in much of Indonesia, including Bali. Most dogs in Bali are free-roaming and often inaccessible for parenteral vaccination without special effort. Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is considered a promising alternative to increase vaccination coverage in these dogs. This study assessed immunogenicity in local dogs in Bali after oral administration of the highly attenuated third-generation rabies virus vaccine strain SPBN GASGAS. Dogs received the oral rabies vaccine either directly or by being offered an egg-flavored bait that contained a vaccine-loaded sachet. The humoral immune response was then compared with two further groups of dogs: a group that received a parenteral inactivated rabies vaccine and an unvaccinated control group. The animals were bled prior to vaccination and between 27 and 32 days after vaccination. The blood samples were tested for the presence of virus-binding antibodies using ELISA. The seroconversion rate in the three groups of vaccinated dogs did not differ significantly: bait: 88.9%; direct-oral: 94.1%; parenteral: 90.9%; control: 0%. There was no significant quantitative difference in the level of antibodies between orally and parenterally vaccinated dogs. This study confirms that SPBN GASGAS is capable of inducing an adequate immune response comparable to a parenteral vaccine under field conditions in Indonesia.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37376704/