PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Canine oral papillary squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis and features

By Thaiwong, Tuddow et al.·Published in Veterinary pathology·2018·Michigan State University, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Immunohistochemical Characterization of Canine Oral Papillary Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A dog with oral cancer was diagnosed with a specific type called papillary squamous cell carcinoma (COPSCC), which can be tricky to identify because it looks similar to non-cancerous growths. This type of cancer tends to grow outward and has a lower chance of spreading compared to other forms of oral cancer. Researchers studied tissue samples to find markers that could help distinguish COPSCC from other similar conditions. They found that certain markers could help with diagnosis, and importantly, no viral cause was found for this type of cancer. Understanding these differences can lead to better treatment options for affected dogs.

People also search for: dog oral cancer symptoms · papillary squamous cell carcinoma in dogs · dog cancer treatment options

Abstract

Recently, histologic subtypes of oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) corresponding to the human classification scheme have been proposed for dogs. A papillary squamous cell carcinoma subtype is characterized by dominant exophytic architectural growth with limited invasion, a lower metastatic rate, and better overall survival compared with conventional SCC. Whereas most canine oral conventional SCCs are easily diagnosed by histologic examination, the diagnosis of canine oral papillary squamous cell carcinoma (COPSCC) can be challenging since the exophytic portion lacks histologic features of malignancy and appears similar to oral nonviral papillomas. In contrast, the invasive portion of COPSCC has morphologic similarities to conventional SCC and canine acanthomatous ameloblastoma. The goals of this study were to immunophenotype these 3 entities and to potentially identify discriminating markers. A panel of 17 immunohistochemical markers was investigated in tissue microarrays that included 25 COPSCCs, 10 conventional SCCs, and 10 canine acanthomatous ameloblastomas. Additionally, COPSCCs were screened for papillomavirus as a potential cause using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. COPSCC had immunophenotypical similarities with conventional SCC and acanthomatous ameloblastoma, but the combined differences in immunolabeling for AE1/AE3, 34βE12, p63, and calretinin discriminated between the entities. Papillomavirus was not detected in any COPSCC, making a viral pathogenesis unlikely. A better understanding of the immunophenotype of COPSCC will aid in a more accurate diagnosis and potentially improve therapeutic approaches.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29262763/