Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How cell salvage devices affect blood transfusions in dogs
By Comas Collgros, Núria et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2024·AURA Veterinary, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Impact of a cell salvage device on blood transfusions to dogs undergoing surgery at a referral veterinary hospital.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs undergoing surgery at a veterinary hospital received blood transfusions, and researchers looked at how a new device for collecting and reusing blood affected this process. The study found that more dogs were getting their own blood back (autologous transfusions) instead of relying on donated blood (homologous transfusions). While the overall number of surgeries and transfusions increased, there was no significant rise in the need for donated blood after the device was introduced. This suggests that using the device can help reduce the risk of reactions to blood transfusions and make better use of available blood resources.
People also search for: dog surgery blood transfusion · dog transfusion reaction symptoms · autologous blood transfusion in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of homologous blood transfusions received by canine surgical patients after introducing a cell salvage device (CSD), trends in surgeries requiring blood transfusion, and the incidence of transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Single referral hospital. ANIMALS: All dogs having surgery at a single center (November 2015 to February 2021). INTERVENTIONS: Medical records of dogs having surgical treatment, including those that received either an autologous or homologous blood transfusion, were reviewed. The surgical patients were the baseline population, and the 2 transfusion groups were compared within this population to analyze the trends. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 37 and 86 dogs received autologous and homologous blood transfusions, respectively. There was an upward trend in the number of total monthly blood transfusions. No significant increase in the monthly number of homologous transfusions was observed before or after acquisition of the CSD. There was also an upward trend in total monthly surgeries, including those with higher risks of hemorrhage. Dogs receiving homologous blood transfusions had a higher incidence of clinical signs consistent with transfusion reactions (6.98%). CONCLUSIONS: An upward trend in autologous blood transfusions was seen with the introduction of a CSD. Hospitals with large surgical caseloads at high risk of hemorrhage may see a decreased need for outsourced blood products with the use of the CSD. The device can lead to a more responsible use of an increasingly scarce resource and decrease the risk of a blood transfusion reaction in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38971979/