Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Collaborative care improves survival for dogs with heart failure
By Lefbom, Bonnie K & Peckens, Neal K·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2016·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Impact of collaborative care on survival time for dogs with congestive heart failure and revenue for attending primary care veterinarians.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 26 small-breed dogs diagnosed with congestive heart failure (CHF) received either collaborative care from both a primary care veterinarian and a veterinary cardiologist or care from the primary veterinarian alone. The dogs that had the collaborative care lived significantly longer, with an average survival time of 254 days compared to just 146 days for those who only saw the primary vet. This suggests that having a specialist involved can improve the health outcomes for dogs with CHF. If your dog is diagnosed with CHF, consider asking your vet about working with a cardiologist for the best care.
People also search for: dog congestive heart failure treatment · small breed dog heart disease · how to help dog with heart problems
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of in-person collaborative care by primary care veterinarians (pcDVMs) and board-certified veterinary cardiologists (BCVCs) on survival time of dogs after onset of congestive heart failure (CHF) and on associated revenue for the attending pcDVMs. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. ANIMALS 26 small-breed dogs treated for naturally occurring CHF secondary to myxomatous mitral valve disease at a multilocation primary care veterinary hospital between 2008 and 2013. PROCEDURES Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify dogs with confirmed CHF secondary to myxomatous mitral valve disease and collect information on patient care, survival time, and pcDVM revenue. Data were compared between dogs that received collaborative care from the pcDVM and a BCVC and dogs that received care from the pcDVM alone. RESULTS Dogs that received collaborative care had a longer median survival time (254 days) than did dogs that received care from the pcDVM alone (146 days). A significant positive correlation was identified between pcDVM revenue and survival time for dogs that received collaborative care (ie, the longer the dog survived, the greater the pcDVM revenue generated from caring for that patient). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Findings suggested that collaborative care provided to small-breed dogs with CHF by a BCVC and pcDVM could result in survival benefits for affected dogs and increased revenue for pcDVMs, compared with care provided by a pcDVM alone.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27308884/