PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Impact of collaborative care on survival time for dogs with congestive heart failure and revenue for attending primary care veterinarians.

Journal:
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Year:
2016
Authors:
Lefbom, Bonnie K & Peckens, Neal K
Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

This study looked at how working together with a heart specialist affects the survival of small-breed dogs with congestive heart failure (CHF), which is a condition where the heart can't pump blood effectively. Researchers reviewed records of 26 dogs treated between 2008 and 2013 and found that those who received care from both their regular vet and a heart specialist lived longer—an average of 254 days compared to 146 days for those who only saw their regular vet. Additionally, the study showed that the longer these dogs lived, the more revenue their regular vets earned from their care. Overall, the findings suggest that having a heart specialist involved can help dogs with CHF live longer and also benefit their regular veterinarians financially.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of in-person collaborative care by primary care veterinarians (pcDVMs) and board-certified veterinary cardiologists (BCVCs) on survival time of dogs after onset of congestive heart failure (CHF) and on associated revenue for the attending pcDVMs. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. ANIMALS 26 small-breed dogs treated for naturally occurring CHF secondary to myxomatous mitral valve disease at a multilocation primary care veterinary hospital between 2008 and 2013. PROCEDURES Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify dogs with confirmed CHF secondary to myxomatous mitral valve disease and collect information on patient care, survival time, and pcDVM revenue. Data were compared between dogs that received collaborative care from the pcDVM and a BCVC and dogs that received care from the pcDVM alone. RESULTS Dogs that received collaborative care had a longer median survival time (254 days) than did dogs that received care from the pcDVM alone (146 days). A significant positive correlation was identified between pcDVM revenue and survival time for dogs that received collaborative care (ie, the longer the dog survived, the greater the pcDVM revenue generated from caring for that patient). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Findings suggested that collaborative care provided to small-breed dogs with CHF by a BCVC and pcDVM could result in survival benefits for affected dogs and increased revenue for pcDVMs, compared with care provided by a pcDVM alone.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27308884/