PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Better blood test and PCR to diagnose dog skin and gut Pythium

By Barua, Subarna et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2026·College of Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Improving noninvasive diagnosis of cutaneous and gastrointestinal forms of Pythium insidiosum infections in dogs: complementary roles of serum-based ELISA and polymerase chain reaction.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A dog with skin and gastrointestinal issues was tested for a serious infection caused by a type of water mold called Pythium insidiosum. Researchers evaluated two diagnostic tests: ELISA, which checks for antibodies, and PCR, which detects the DNA of the pathogen. The ELISA test was very effective, identifying nearly all positive cases, while PCR was particularly useful for confirming active infections. Using both tests together improved the accuracy of diagnosing this infection, helping veterinarians make better treatment decisions.

People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · Pythium insidiosum symptoms in dogs · PCR test for dog infections

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ELISA and PCR for detecting pathogenic oomycete infections and to explore associations with clinical presentation and treatment status. METHODS: Canine sera (n = 796) submitted to Pythium Serology Diagnostic Laboratory (from 2023 through 2025) were analyzed by ELISA to detect anti-Pythium antibodies and a PCR targeting Pythium insidiosum, Lagenidium spp, and Paralagenidium spp. Clinical records were reviewed for a subset of submissions. Analyses included χ2 tests, a linear mixed-effects model, and Cohen κ for ELISA-PCR agreement. RESULTS: Across all 697 samples tested by both methods, 69 (9.9%) were positive and 495 (71.0%) were negative by both assays, yielding an overall concordance of 81%. Polymerase chain reaction identified 5 cases, including cutaneous infections and Lagenidium infections tested to be negative by ELISA. Among confirmed positive submissions, ELISA detected anti-Pythium antibodies in 99.4% (182 of 183), whereas PCR detected Pythium DNA in 45.6% (72 of 158). CONCLUSIONS: While ELISA is well suited for first-line screening due to its high sensitivity, PCR provides critical specificity and broader detection, especially in challenging cutaneous cases and when alternative pathogenic oomycetes are suspected. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was highly effective for initial diagnosis and monitoring treatment response, and PCR was most useful for identifying active infections or relapses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The combined use of ELISA and PCR enhances diagnostic accuracy, improves detection of misdiagnosed Lagenidium infections, and guides clinical decision-making and epidemiological surveillance of this emerging and serious disease.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41135573/