PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Ear rinse with tromethamine and EDTA kills bacteria in dog ear

By Cole, Lynette K et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2006·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: In vitro activity of an ear rinse containing tromethamine, EDTA, and benzyl alcohol on bacterial pathogens from dogs with otitis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with ear infections (otitis) had bacteria collected from their ears to test a new ear rinse containing tromethamine, EDTA, and benzyl alcohol. The rinse showed promising results, significantly reducing the growth of harmful bacteria like Pseudomonas and beta-hemolytic streptococcus within just 15 minutes. It also worked against Proteus bacteria within 30 minutes and Staphylococcus bacteria within an hour. While this study was done in the lab, it suggests that this ear rinse could be effective for treating ear infections in dogs, especially when combined with other treatments.

People also search for: dog ear infection treatment · best ear rinse for dogs · how to treat dog otitis at home

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vitro activity of an ear rinse (ER) containing tromethamine, EDTA, and benzyl alcohol on bacterial pathogens from dogs with otitis. SAMPLE POPULATION: Organisms were collected from ear swab specimens from the external and middle ear and included Staphylococcus spp (n = 11; Staphylococcus intermedius [7] and Staphylococcus spp [4]), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5), Proteus spp (5), beta-hemolytic streptococcus (11), and 1 control strain of each organism. PROCEDURES: 3 test solutions were evaluated including EDTA, tromethamine, and benzyl alcohol (ER); EDTA and tromethamine (ER without benzyl alcohol [ER - BA]); and purified water. Ten-milliliter aliquots of each test solution were transferred into 36 tubes and inoculated with one of the organisms. Samples were retrieved from each tube at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, transferred to Petri dishes, mixed with soybean-casein digest agar, and incubated. After incubation, plates were examined for growth, and the number of colonies was expressed as CFU per milliliter. RESULTS: ER significantly decreased bacterial growth in vitro of P aeruginosa and beta-hemolytic streptococcal organisms within 15 minutes, Proteus spp within 30 minutes, and Staphylococcus spp within 60 minutes. Comparatively, the presence of benzyl alcohol in ER significantly decreased bacterial growth of beta-hemolytic streptococcus and Proteus spp. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: On the basis of results of this study, future studies should be performed to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of ER alone as a treatment for otic infections caused by beta-hemolytic streptococcus, P aeruginosa, and Proteus spp and of ER combined with an antimicrobial agent for otic infections caused by Staphylococcus spp.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16740099/