PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Narasin antibiotic activity against dog ear infection bacteria

By Chan, Wei Yee et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2018·School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Australia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: In vitro antimicrobial activity of narasin against common clinical isolates associated with canine otitis externa.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study tested narasin, a drug typically used in livestock, for its ability to fight bacteria and yeast causing ear infections in dogs. The researchers found that narasin was effective against certain bacteria, particularly Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, but not against Pseudomonas or Proteus, which are also common in ear infections. It showed some antifungal activity against Malassezia, a yeast, but only at high doses. While narasin could be a helpful option for some cases of canine ear infections, it shouldn't be the only treatment used, especially if Gram-negative bacteria are involved.

People also search for: dog ear infection treatment · narasin for dog ear infections · why is my dog shaking his head · dog ear infection bacteria · Malassezia in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship are of ever-increasing importance in veterinary medicine. Re-purposing of old drugs that are not used in human medicine is one approach that addresses the emergence of multidrug resistance in canine skin and ear infections, and can reduce the use of critically important human antibiotic classes. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To determine the antimicrobial activity of narasin, a polyether ionophore conventionally used as a rumen modifier and anticoccidial agent in production animals, against common clinical isolates of canine otitis externa (OE). ANIMALS/ISOLATES: Clinical isolates (n = 110) from canine OE were tested, including 17 meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MSSP), 13 multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MDRSP), and 20 each of β-haemolytic Streptococcus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis and Malassezia pachydermatis. METHODS: Bacterial and yeast isolates were subcultured, suspended in broth and inoculated into 96-well plates. Organisms were tested against concentrations of narasin ranging from 0.03 to 128 μg/mL. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined after overnight incubation. RESULTS: Narasin MICs for staphylococcal and streptococcal isolates ranged from 0.06 to 0.25 μg/mL; MICand MICvalues for both organisms were 0.125 μg/mL. No MICs were achieved for Pseudomonas or Proteus isolates. There was a weak antifungal effect against M. pachydermatis isolates (MIC 32 to >128 μg/mL). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Narasin was effective against Gram-positive bacteria and had antifungal activity at higher concentrations against M. pachydermatis. However, the lack of Gram-negative activity would prevent its use as a sole antimicrobial agent in cases of canine OE.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29363210/