Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Blue light kills antibiotic-resistant Staph pseudintermedius bacteria
By Schnedeker, Amy H et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2017·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: In vitro bactericidal activity of blue light (465 nm) phototherapy on meticillin-susceptible and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at how effective blue light therapy is for treating skin infections caused by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, a common bacteria in dogs. While blue light significantly reduced the growth of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), it did not have the same effect on meticillin-susceptible or meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. This means that while blue light therapy might help with some bacterial infections, it may not be a good option for treating skin infections caused by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs. More research is needed to find effective treatments for these infections.
People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · blue light therapy for dogs · Staphylococcus pseudintermedius infection
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the most common cause of bacterial skin infections in dogs. Meticillin-resistant infections have become more common and are challenging to treat. Blue light phototherapy may be an option for treating these infections. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to measure the in vitro bactericidal activity of 465 nm blue light on meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MSSP) and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP). We hypothesized that irradiation with blue light would kill MSSP and MRSP in a dose-dependent fashion in vitro as previously reported for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: In six replicate experiments, each strain [MSSP, n = 1; MRSP ST-71 (KM1381) n = 1; and MRSA (BAA-1680) n = 1] were cultivated on semisolid media, irradiated using a 465 nm blue light phototherapeutic device at the cumulative doses of 56.25, 112.5 and 225 J/cmand incubated overnight at 35°C. Controls were not irradiated. Colony counts (CC) were performed manually. Descriptive statistics were performed and treatment effects assessed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank-sum test. Bonferroni-corrected rank-sum tests were performed for post hoc analysis when significant differences were identified. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in CC with blue light irradiation at all doses for MRSA (P = 0.0006) but not for MSSP (P = 0.131) or MRSP (P = 0.589). CONCLUSIONS: Blue light phototherapy significantly reduced CC of MRSA, but not of MSSP or MRSP. The mechanism for the relative photosensitivity of the MRSA isolate is unknown, but is hypothesized to be due to an increased concentration of porphyrin in S. aureus relative to S. pseudintermedius, which would modulate blue light absorption.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28543810/