PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New bone nail design tested for healing broken dog shin bones

By Déjardin, Loïc M et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2014·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: In vivo biomechanical evaluation of a novel angle-stable interlocking nail design in a canine tibial fracture model.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of purpose-bred hounds with tibial fractures were treated with either a new type of interlocking nail (AS-ILN) or a standard one (ILN6b) to see which helped them heal better. Dogs with the AS-ILN showed less limping and reached full healing in about 10 weeks, while those with the standard nail took up to 18 weeks to heal. The new nail also provided stronger support for the bone during recovery. Overall, the AS-ILN led to quicker and more effective healing compared to the standard option.

People also search for: dog tibial fracture treatment · dog limping after surgery · interlocking nail for dog fracture

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcome and callus biomechanical properties of a novel angle stable interlocking nail (AS-ILN) and a 6 mm bolted standard ILN (ILN6b) in a canine tibial fracture model. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental in vivo study. ANIMALS: Purpose-bred hounds (n = 11). METHODS: A 5 mm mid-diaphyseal tibial ostectomy was stabilized with an AS-ILN (n = 6) or an ILN6b (n = 5). Orthopedic examinations and radiographs were performed every other week until clinical union (18 weeks). Paired tibiae were tested in torsion until failure. Callus torsional strength and toughness were statistically compared and failure mode described. Total and cortical callus volumes were computed and statistically compared from CT slices of the original ostectomy gap. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 RESULTS: From 4 to 8 weeks, lameness was less pronounced in AS-ILN than ILN6b dogs (P < .05). Clinical union was reached in all AS-ILN dogs by 10 weeks and in 3/5 ILN6b dogs at 18 weeks. Callus mechanical properties were significantly greater in AS-ILN than ILN6b specimens by 77% (failure torque) and 166% (toughness). Failure occurred by acute spiral (control and AS-ILN) or progressive transverse fractures (ILN6b). Cortical callus volume was 111% greater in AS-ILN than ILN6b specimens (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Earlier functional recovery, callus strength and remodeling suggest that the AS-ILN provides a postoperative biomechanical environment more conducive to bone healing than a comparable standard ILN.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24467692/