Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
In vivo preclinical evaluation of the influence of osteoporosis on the anchorage of different pedicle screw designs.
- Journal:
- European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
- Year:
- 2011
- Authors:
- Giavaresi, Gianluca et al.
- Affiliation:
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies · Italy
Abstract
We investigate the anchorage of pedicle screws with different surface treatments in osteoporotic bone. Eight ewes were divided into two groups of four animals each: four sheep underwent bilateral ovariectomy (OVX Group), whereas the operation was simulated in the remaining group (SHAM Group). Eighteen months after the first operation, the Dynesys(®) System was fitted to the sheep using pedicle screws with three different surface treatments: untreated, rough blasted (uncoated) and bioactive coated (bioactive). Uncoated screws showed a significantly higher bone ingrowth value compared with the untreated screws in the OVX group (9.3%, p < 0.005) and a significantly lower bone ingrowth value in the SHAM group (-11.0%, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the bioactive pedicle screws had a significant lower bone ingrowth value than the untreated screws in the SHAM group (-12.1%, p < 0.05). These results suggest that both tested surface treatments of pedicular screws may provide an advantage in terms of bone quality and osseointegration, when implanted in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21544593/