Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Surgical site infection risk after dog eye removal surgery
By Dacanay, Samantha J et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2022·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection following enucleation in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 280 dogs that had eye removal surgery (enucleation) was monitored for infections at the surgical site. About 5% of these dogs developed infections afterward, but researchers couldn't find any specific reasons why these infections occurred. Interestingly, dogs that received a certain antibiotic (cephalexin) after surgery were more likely to get an infection compared to those who received a different antibiotic, but overall, using antibiotics didn't seem to help prevent infections. This suggests that giving antibiotics after this type of surgery may not be necessary.
People also search for: dog eye surgery infection · enucleation recovery in dogs · post-operative care for dog surgery
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSI) increase morbidity, increase treatment costs, and can delay onset of necessary adjunctive therapy. The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors of SSI after enucleation in dogs. METHODS: Medical records were searched at one veterinary teaching hospital and identified 280 dogs that underwent enucleation and had an adequate follow-up to assess SSI. Multiple preoperative (e.g., reason for enucleation), peri-operative (e.g., surgical approach and surgeon experience level), and post-operative (e.g., use of post-operative antibiotics or anti-inflammatory medications) variables were assessed as risk factors for development of SSI. RESULTS: The incidence of SSI after enucleation was 5%, and no risk factors for SSI were identified. Dogs that received cephalexin as a prophylactic post-operative antibiotic were statistically more likely to develop SSI versus those that received a different post-operative antibiotic (= 0.045). However, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear as administration of prophylactic post-operative antibiotics overall did not reduce the risk of SSI in the population evaluated here. DISCUSSION: No risk factors were identified to guide clinical decision-making for prevention of SSI. Additionally, the results do not support the use of prophylactic antibiotics after enucleation in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36713880/