Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Bacterial infections in IV catheters removed from dogs
By Guzmán Ramos, Pedro Jose et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2018·Hospital Clí, Spain·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Incidence of and associated factors for bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters removed from dogs in response to clinical complications.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 182 dogs that had intravenous (IV) catheters placed during their hospital stay were studied to see how often these catheters became infected. The results showed that nearly 40% of the catheters removed due to complications had bacteria growing on them, with Acinetobacter being the most common type found. Factors like the experience level of the staff placing the catheters and the use of steroid medications were linked to higher infection rates. This highlights the importance of careful monitoring and technique when placing IV catheters in dogs to prevent infections.
People also search for: dog IV catheter infection · Acinetobacter in dogs · dog hospital complications
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infection rate associated with intravenous (IV) catheter placement is emerging as an important issue in small animal veterinary medicine, mostly because of the economic costs associated with these infections. Identification of possible associated factors may provide useful information for the surveillance and prevention of such infections. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of positive bacterial cultures obtained from IV catheters used in dogs hospitalized for at least 48 hours and removed because of clinical complication. To identify the bacteria involved and factors associated with bacterial colonization. ANIMALS: One-hundred eighty-two dogs that underwent IV catheterization from January 2015 to July 2015 at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of Alfonso X el Sabio University of Madrid were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: The bacterial colonization rate of all IV catheters removed in response to clinical complications was 39.6%, the cumulative proportion of catheters that remained in place at 24, 48, and 72 hours after placement was 89.5, 78, and 59.4%, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression indicated significant associations for staff who performed catheterization (junior, P = .002; student, P = .034) and use of steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P = .036). The most frequently isolated bacterium was Acinetobacter spp. (21.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The bacterial colonization incidence related to IV catheter placement was slightly higher than the incidence described in other veterinary studies. Associated factors not previously described in veterinary medicine were found. The most frequently isolated organism was Acinetobacter spp., indicating its importance as an emerging pathogen in catheter colonization.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29602241/