PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

When vets order blood cultures for dogs and what positive results mean

By Epstein, Steven E et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2025·Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Indications for Blood Cultures in Dogs and Associations With Positive Results in 323 Submissions.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with various health issues underwent blood tests to check for bacteria in their blood (bacteremia). Out of 323 tests, 55 showed bacterial growth, with 35 being significant for their health. The tests were most useful for dogs suspected of having discospondylitis (a spinal infection) or those on immunosuppressive medications. The study found that taking larger blood samples increased the chances of detecting harmful bacteria. This information can help veterinarians decide when to perform blood cultures and how to interpret the results.

People also search for: dog blood test results · symptoms of discospondylitis in dogs · immunosuppressive drugs for dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia has been associated with many diseases in dogs, but contemporary data from a large and diverse population are lacking. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Report reasons for blood culture, protocols used, and diseases associated with a positive result in a tertiary referral institution. We hypothesized that larger volumes of blood, lack of previous antimicrobial administration, and changes in hematologic variables would be associated with increased rates of microbiological growth. ANIMALS: A total of 279 dogs from which 323 blood culture results were available. METHODS: For 180 submissions, patient and blood culture protocol data at the time of specimen collection were collected prospectively using a survey form. For 143 submissions, data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Microbial growth was noted in 55/323 (17%) submissions, with 35/55 (63.6%) interpreted as clinically relevant growth and 20 (36.4%) interpreted as contamination, resulting in an overall positive rate of 10.8%. Specimen volume (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.01), white blood cell count (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and neutrophil count (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001) were positively associated with relevant growth. Diseases associated with relevant growth were suspected discospondylitis (30%, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.05) and illness while on immunosuppressive drugs (44%, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004). Submissions performed to assess for bacteremia as a secondary cause of immune-mediated disease were less likely to yield relevant growth (0%, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004) than those performed for other reasons. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In this population, blood cultures were most likely to provide diagnostically useful information in dogs with suspected discospondylitis and those receiving immunosuppressive drugs. Specimen volume should be maximized to increase the likelihood of clinically relevant growth.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40884536/