Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Detecting trotting dog lameness using motion sensors
By Rhodin, M et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2017·Department of Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Inertial sensor-based system for lameness detection in trotting dogs with induced lameness.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of healthy dogs was tested to see if a special sensor system could detect lameness while they trotted on a treadmill. The sensors measured how the dogs' heads and pelvis moved to identify differences that indicated lameness in their front or back legs. When the dogs were made to limp, the sensors showed clear changes in their movement patterns. This technology could help veterinarians better assess lameness in dogs, but more research is needed to confirm its effectiveness in real-world situations.
People also search for: dog lameness detection · how to tell if my dog is limping · dog trotting lameness test · signs of dog leg pain · dog movement analysis
Abstract
Lameness detection can be challenging in dogs, as reflected in the reported low inter-rater agreement when visually assessing lameness. The aim of this study was to use an inertial sensor-based system to detect and quantify induced distal and proximal limb disturbances mimicking supporting and swinging limb lameness in dogs trotting on a treadmill by measuring vertical head and pelvic movement symmetry. Ten clinically sound dogs were equipped with inertial measurement units that were attached to the head, pelvis and right distal forelimb. Vertical head and pelvic movement symmetry were measured while dogs trotted on a treadmill, before and after the induction of moderate support or swinging fore- and hindlimb lameness. Four symmetry variables were calculated: the differences in displacement between the two lowest and between the two highest values of the head and pelvis per stride, respectively. These variables were defined as minimum head difference (HDmin), maximum head difference (HDmax), minimum pelvic difference (PDmin) and maximum pelvic difference (PDmax). Induction of supporting forelimb and hindlimb lameness produced significant changes in HDmin and PDmin, respectively. Swinging forelimb and hindlimb lameness produced significant changes in HDmax and PDmax, respectively. Additional compensatory ipsilateral forelimb and contralateral hindlimb movements were detected. Based on our findings, inertial sensor-based systems can be used to detect and quantify induced moderate lameness and differentiate between supporting and swinging limb lameness in dogs trotting on a treadmill. Further studies are needed to evaluate this method in dogs presented for clinical lameness evaluation and in overground locomotion.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28283369/