Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Echocardiographic monitoring of dogs after pulmonary valve balloon
By Winter, R L et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2023·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Integrative echocardiographic assessment of post-operative obstruction severity and restenosis after balloon valvuloplasty in 81 dogs with pulmonary stenosis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
An 8-year-old Labrador with pulmonary stenosis (a heart defect) underwent a balloon procedure to open up a narrowed heart valve. After the surgery, the vet monitored the dog's heart function using ultrasound at several points over time. While the immediate results looked good, further checks revealed that about 18-38% of dogs experienced a return of the obstruction several months later. This suggests that follow-up exams are crucial to assess the long-term success of the procedure.
People also search for: dog heart surgery recovery · Labrador pulmonary stenosis treatment · balloon valvuloplasty for dogs
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary stenosis (PS) is a congenital defect in the dog that is managed with balloon valvuloplasty (BV). Obstruction severity is routinely assessed using transthoracic echocardiography. The objectives of this study were to describe the short-term changes and long-term restenosis by retrospectively evaluating flow-dependent and flow-independent echocardiographic variables for dogs with PS after BV. ANIMALS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: Medical records and stored echocardiographic images were reviewed from dogs that received BV for PS. The following echocardiographic variables were measured or calculated: maximum systolic ejection velocity (Vmax) and velocity-derived maximal pressure gradient (PV maxPG) across the pulmonary valve; ratio of aortic to pulmonary velocity time integral (VTI/VTI); ratio of aortic to pulmonary maximal velocity. RESULTS: Eighty-one dogs with PS that had a BV were included. Each of these dogs had pulmonary obstruction severity assessed in at least three timepoints. Forty-nine dogs had at least one additional examination performed, the last of which occurred a median of 504 days after the BV. Echocardiographic variables at the first follow-up had increased by a clinically relevant quantity in 20-34% of the dogs when comparing to the immediate post-BV examination. The last follow-up examination identified valve restenosis in 18-38% of the dogs in this study. Valve type and pre-BV obstruction severity did not have a significant effect (P > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: For the assessment of BV efficacy, the immediate post-BV echocardiogram may not be as useful as the first follow-up examination several months later. Pulmonary restenosis after BV may be more prevalent than previously reported.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36716612/