PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How electrical wave collisions affect heart therapy in dogs

By Strik, Marc et al.·Published in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology·2013·Department of Physiology, Netherlands·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Interplay of electrical wavefronts as determinant of the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in dyssynchronous canine hearts.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with heart problems, specifically chronic left bundle-branch block or atrioventricular block, underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to improve their heart function. The researchers tested various pacing settings to find the best combination that would help the heart pump more effectively. They discovered that the best results came from settings that allowed the pacing signals to work together with the heart's natural signals, leading to better synchronization of heartbeats. Overall, the therapy improved heart function in these dogs, showing that proper timing of electrical signals is crucial for effective treatment.

People also search for: dog heart problems treatment · cardiac resynchronization therapy for dogs · improving dog heart function

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of electromechanical synchronization and ventricular filling to the optimal hemodynamic effect in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) during adjustment of stimulation-timings is incompletely understood. We investigated whether optimal hemodynamic effect in CRT requires collision of pacing-induced and intrinsic activation waves and optimal filling of the left ventricle (LV). METHODS AND RESULTS: CRT was performed in dogs with chronic left bundle-branch block (n=8) or atrioventricular (AV) block (n=6) through atrial (A), right ventricular (RV) apex, and LV-basolateral pacing. A 100 randomized combinations of A-LV/A-RV intervals were tested. Total activation time (TAT) was calculated from >100 contact mapping electrodes. Mechanical interventricular dyssynchrony was determined as the time delay between upslopes of LV and RV pressure curves. Settings providing an increase in LVdP/dtmax (maximal rate of rise of left ventricular pressure) of ≥90% of the maximum LVdP/dtmax value were defined as optimal (CRTopt). Filling was assessed by changes in LV end-diastolic volume (EDV; conductance catheter technique). In all hearts, CRTopt was observed during multiple settings, providing an average LVdP/dtmax increase of ≈15%. In AV-block hearts, CRTopt exclusively depended on interventricular-interval and not on AV-interval. In left bundle-branch block hearts, CRTopt occurred at A-LV intervals that allowed fusion of LV-pacing-derived activation with right bundle-derived activation. In all animals, CRTopt occurred at settings resulting in the largest decrease in TAT and mechanical interventricular dyssynchrony, whereas LV EDV hardly changed. CONCLUSIONS: In left bundle-branch block and AV-block hearts, optimal hemodynamic effect of CRT depends on optimal interplay between pacing-induced and intrinsic activation waves and the corresponding mechanical resynchronization rather than filling.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24047705/