Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Botulinum toxin injections for hip arthritis pain in dogs
By Nicácio, Gabriel Montoro et al.·Published in The Journal of veterinary medical science·2019·Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anestesiology, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Intra-articular botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) for pain management in dogs with osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 16 dogs with hip dysplasia-related osteoarthritis received either an injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) or a saline solution to help manage their chronic pain. All dogs also took oral supplements and a pain medication for 15 days. Over 90 days, both groups showed improvement in their pain levels, but there was no significant difference in pain relief between the BoNT/A and saline groups. Both treatments were safe and helped reduce the symptoms associated with hip osteoarthritis, but the botulinum toxin did not work better than the saline solution.
People also search for: dog hip dysplasia pain treatment · botulinum toxin for dogs arthritis · osteoarthritis pain management in dogs
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intra-articular (IA) injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) to the management of chronic pain in dogs. In a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study sixteen dogs with osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia were distributed into two groups: 25 IU BoNT/A (BoNT) or saline solution (Control) was administered IA in each affected joint. All dogs received oral supplements (90 days) and carprofen (15 days). The dogs were assessed by a veterinarian on five occasions and the owner completed an assessment form at the same time (baseline to 90 days). The data were analyzed using unpaired-t test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance and the Tukey's test (P<0.05). There were no differences between groups in the veterinarian and owner assessments. Lower scores were observed in both groups during 90 days after IA therapy in the owner assessments (P<0.001). Compared with baseline, the Vet score was lower from 15-90 days after IA injection in the BoNT group, and at 15 and 30 days in the Control group (P<0.001). Both treatments were safe and reduced the clinical signs associated with hip osteoarthritis. However, IA BoNT/A (25 IU) did not provide better pain relief than the control treatment.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30643103/