PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Botulinum toxin injections for joint pain in dogs with arthritis

By Heikkilä, H M et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2014·Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Intra-articular botulinum toxin A for the treatment of osteoarthritic joint pain in dogs: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 36 dogs with chronic joint pain from osteoarthritis in their stifles, hips, or elbows received either an injection of botulinum toxin A or a placebo. Over 12 weeks, the dogs that got the botulinum toxin showed significant improvements in their ability to bear weight and overall pain levels compared to those who received the placebo. While the treatment group did not report a noticeable change in pain scores or need for additional pain relief, the objective measurements indicated that the botulinum toxin helped reduce their pain. This suggests that botulinum toxin A could be a helpful option for managing osteoarthritis pain in dogs.

People also search for: dog joint pain treatment · botulinum toxin for dogs arthritis · osteoarthritis pain relief for dogs

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intra-articular (IA) botulinum toxin A (IA BoNT A) for the treatment of osteoarthritic joint pain in dogs. The study was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial with parallel group design and 12-week follow-up. Thirty-six dogs with chronic lameness due to stifle, hip or elbow osteoarthritis were randomized to receive an IA injection of 30IU of BoNT A or placebo. The main outcome variables were vertical impulse (VI) and peak vertical force (PVF) measured with a force platform, and Helsinki chronic pain index (HCPI). Subjective pain score and the need for rescue analgesics were secondary variables. The response to treatment was assessed as the change from baseline to each examination week. The variables were analyzed by ANOVA with repeated measurements and results were considered statistically significant if P ⩽ 0.05. The improvement from baseline to 12 weeks after baseline was statistically significant in VI, PVF and HCPI in the treatment group (P=0.001, P=0.054 and P=0.053, respectively). Additionally, there were statistically significant improvements in VI in the treatment group at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after baseline (P=0.037, P=0.016 and P=0.016, respectively). The difference between groups in improvement in VI was statistically significant at 12weeks after baseline (P=0.005). There was no significant change in the subjective pain score or in the requirement for rescue analgesics in either group. No major adverse events thought to be related to trial protocol were detected. These results suggest that IA BoNT A has some efficacy in reducing osteoarthritic pain in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24675370/