PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

DNA rabies vaccine in cat ear skin protects cats best

By Tesoro-Cruz, Emiliano et al.·Published in Veterinary research·2008·Unidad de Investigaci&#xf3·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Intradermal DNA vaccination in ear pinnae is an efficient route to protect cats against rabies virus.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

Three groups of cats were given a DNA vaccine to protect against rabies, with one group receiving the vaccine directly into their ear pinnae. The cats that received the vaccine in their ears developed strong immunity, showing high levels of protective antibodies and surviving a later rabies challenge. In contrast, those vaccinated through the muscle had the lowest antibody levels and did not survive the challenge. This study suggests that vaccinating cats against rabies via the ear is an effective method, while other methods may not provide adequate protection.

People also search for: cat rabies vaccine effectiveness · how to vaccinate cats against rabies · cat vaccination routes

Abstract

A DNA vaccine against rabies (pGQH) was administrated to cats in order to examine different administration routes. Four groups of three cats each were inoculated with pGQH as follows: group A, intramuscularly (IM), 100 microg; group B, intranasally (IN), 100 microg; group C, intradermally into ear pinnae (ID-EP), 100 microg, and group D, IM, 200 microL of phosphate buffer solution (PBS) alone (control group). Blood was drawn on days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180. Groups A, B, and C received a booster on day 30. At day 200 all animals were challenged. A passive transfer of cat sera, as well as a viral challenge, was performed in mice. The results displayed that neutralizing antibody titers were higher in cats of group C (ID-EP) showing high early titers (> 2 IU) and the highest titer was on day 120 (> 14 IU). In group B (IN), two out of three cats seroconverted on day 30 (> 0.5 IU), the third cat seroconverted until day 60 (> 0.5 IU). In contrast, the lowest levels of neutralizing antibodies were detected in group A (IM). The control group showed no anti-rabies antibodies. Groups A (IM) and D (control) succumbed after lethal challenge. All animals from the ID-EP group (C) survived, only one individual from the IN (B) group died. Mice that received cat sera from ID-EP, IM, and IN groups survived and were protected (30/30 survivors). Mice groups that received pre-immunization sera from cats were not protected (0/30 survivors). This study demonstrates that pGQH immunization was successful when it was administrated ID-EP, and acceptable through the IN route. The IM route, however, was not effective in cats. For vaccination, the IN route seems attractive due to its accessibility for application, but it seems to activate seroconversion slowly. The best route to promote anti-rabies antibody titers was the ID-EP route. This practical and efficient route should be further studied.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18215393/