Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Stem cell treatment tested for asthma in cats
By Trzil, Julie E et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2016·IndyVet Emergency and Specialty Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Intravenous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the treatment of feline asthma: a pilot study.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of six cats with asthma were treated with stem cells derived from fat to see if it could help their breathing problems. After several treatments over a few months, the cats showed significant improvement by the end of the study, with reduced airway inflammation and better lung function compared to those who received a placebo. The stem cell therapy seemed to help lower the number of inflammatory cells in their lungs and improve their overall breathing. While more research is needed, this treatment shows promise for helping cats with asthma.
People also search for: cat asthma treatment · feline asthma stem cell therapy · why is my cat coughing · cat breathing problems remedy
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of serially administered adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in an experimental feline asthma model. METHODS: Allergic asthma was acutely induced with Bermuda grass allergen in six purpose-bred cats. Five intravenous infusions of allogeneic MSCs (n = 4; MSC-treated) or saline (n = 2; placebo-treated) were administered over the first 130 days after asthma induction. Infusions contained 2 × 10, 4 × 10, 4.7 × 10, 1 × 10and 1 × 10cryopreserved MSCs/cat. For thoracic imaging additional cats were enrolled as control groups: four untreated, experimentally asthmatic cats (combined with placebo-treated cats), and six healthy, non-asthmatic cats. Outcome measures included airway eosinophilia, pulmonary mechanics, thoracic computed tomography and several immunologic assays. RESULTS: Cats were assessed for 9 months after treatment. At early points, airway eosinophil percentage was not affected by MSC administration (post-treatment average of days 12, 26, 47, 108 and 133 in MSC-treated cats was 41 ± 15% and in placebo-treated cats it was 34 ± 16%). By month 9, eosinophil percentages in all MSC-treated cats decreased to normal reference intervals (MSC-treated 6%; placebo-treated 20%; normal <17%). Diminished airway hyper-responsiveness was noted in all MSC-treated compared with placebo-treated cats at day 133 (dose of methacholine to double baseline airway resistance: MSC-treated median 22.9 mg/ml [range 6.4-64.0]; individual placebo-treated cats 1.1 and 5.0 mg/ml). Lung attenuation (mean ± SEM MSC-treated -865 ± 12 Hounsfield units [HU]; untreated asthmatics -820 ± 11 HU; P = 0.004) and bronchial wall thickening scores (median [interquartile range] MSC-treated 0 [0-1.5]; untreated asthmatic 11.6 [7.3-27.3]; P = 0.010) were significantly reduced in MSC-treated vs untreated asthmatic cats, consistent with decreased airway remodeling at month 9. No clear immunologic mechanisms by which MSCs act were determined. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: MSCs may have a delayed effect in reducing airway inflammation, airway hyper-responsiveness and remodeling in experimentally induced asthmatic cats. Results warrant additional investigation of MSC therapy for asthma in cats.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26384398/