Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Antinuclear antibodies found in dogs with atopic dermatitis
By Ginel, P. J. & Lucena, R.·Published in Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A·2001·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Investigation of Antinuclear Antibodies in Canine Atopic Dermatitis
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 40 dogs with skin allergies (atopic dermatitis) had their blood tested for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), which can indicate autoimmune issues. Out of these dogs, 10 tested positive for ANA, with a higher rate among those showing facial skin lesions. While the overall response to immunotherapy was about 65%, only 40% of the ANA-positive dogs responded well to treatment, compared to 73% of those without ANA. This suggests that while ANA is more common in dogs with skin allergies, it may not significantly affect treatment outcomes.
People also search for: dog skin allergies treatment · dog facial lesions · atopic dermatitis in dogs · antinuclear antibodies in dogs · immunotherapy for dog skin problems
Abstract
Serum samples from 40 atopic dogs and 20 healthy dogs were assayed for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) using a human epithelial cell line (HEp‐2) and standard indirect immunofluorescent methods. Samples from the atopic dogs were grouped according to the presence (n=28) or absence (n=12) of facial lesions at any moment during the follow‐up period. Positive ANA titres were found in 10 of the 40 atopic dogs analysed (25 %) whereas samples from the control group were negative. Eight atopic dogs with facial lesions had a positive titre (28.57 %) in contrast with atopic dogs without facial lesions where two positive samples (16.67 %) were found; however, the differences were statistically not significant. Endpoint titres were low (1/40), only two samples yielded a 1/80 positive titre and one sample had a 1/320 titre, all of them from the facial lesions group. Response to immunotherapy was classified as positive only in four of the 10 ANA‐positive patients (40 %) compared with a response rate of 73 % (22 of 30) in the ANA‐negative atopic dogs. However, a Fisher’s exact test showed a two‐sided P‐value of 0.122 which was considered statistically not significant. The overall response rate to immunotherapy for all atopic dogs was 65 % (26 of 40). In conclusion, the prevalence of ANA is higher in atopic than in healthy dogs, especially if facial lesions are present. Although a clinically significant pathogenic contribution is not probable, this higher prevalence should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of canine autoimmune dermatitis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00346.x