Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How reliable is the Schirmer tear test for measuring cat tear
By Sebbag, Lionel et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2020·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Investigation of Schirmer tear test-1 for measurement of tear production in cats in various environmental settings and with different test durations.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 176 cats underwent a Schirmer tear test (STT-1) to measure tear production in different environments, including quiet and noisy settings. The test showed that tear production measurements were consistent regardless of the surrounding noise, even though the cats' heart rates changed due to stress. This means that the STT-1 is a reliable way to assess tear production in cats, and shorter testing times may be sufficient in some cases. The findings can help veterinarians better understand and diagnose eye issues in cats.
People also search for: cat eye problems · Schirmer tear test for cats · why is my cat's eye watery · cat tear production test · cat eye test duration
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess reliability of the Schirmer tear test-1 (STT-1) for measurement of tear production in cats in various environments, investigate whether sympathetic stimulation impacts measurements, and determine whether meaningful conclusions regarding lacrimation in cats can be drawn from STT-1 measurements obtained with STT strip placement for < 1 minute. ANIMALS: 176 cats examined in a private practice (n = 100), a feral cat clinic (56), or a veterinary teaching hospital (20). PROCEDURES: The STT-1 was performed in both eyes of each cat. Measurements were recorded at 10- or 30-second intervals for 1 minute. Cats at the teaching hospital were tested once in a quiet examination room (unstimulated conditions) and once in the same room with loud prerecorded noises (stimulated conditions), with a 30-minute interval between tests and evaluation of cats' heart rates before and after STT-1. Data were analyzed with parametric statistical tools and a nonlinear mixed-effect model. RESULTS: 30- and 60-second STT-1 measurements were significantly correlated (= 0.94). The STT-1 measurements did not differ under nonstimulated versus stimulated conditions, despite significant changes in heart rates that indicated sympathetic stimulation. A hyperbolic model of STT-1 kinetics was validated, allowing for extrapolation of measurements obtained in < 60 seconds and generation of reference values (95% predictive intervals) for various test durations. Median (95% predictive interval) 30- and 60-second STT-1 measurements were 9.1 mm (4.8 to 15.6 mm) and 14.3 mm (8.2 to 22.3 mm), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The STT-1 was a reliable diagnostic test in all settings; results were not affected by sympathetic stimulation, and a shorter duration of testing could be considered in selected cases.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32125244/