Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Bacteriophages that kill Pseudomonas eye infections in dogs
By Santos, Thiago M A et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2011·Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Isolation and characterization of two bacteriophages with strong in vitro antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from dogs with ocular infections.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with eye infections caused by a bacteria called Pseudomonas aeruginosa were treated with two specific bacteriophages (P2S2 and P5U5) that showed strong ability to kill this bacteria. The researchers found that P5U5 was effective against all tested strains, while P2S2 worked on about 81% of them. Both bacteriophages significantly reduced the growth of the bacteria in lab tests, suggesting they could be promising treatments for these infections in dogs. This study indicates that using bacteriophages could be a potential new way to help dogs suffering from eye infections.
People also search for: dog eye infection treatment · Pseudomonas aeruginosa in dogs · bacteriophage therapy for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To isolate and characterize bacteriophages with strong in vitro lytic activity against various pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from dogs with ocular infections. SAMPLE: 26 genetically distinct P aeruginosa isolates. PROCEDURES: P aeruginosa strains were derived from dogs with naturally acquired ulcerative keratitis. From a large-scale screening for bacteriophages with potential therapeutic benefit against canine ocular infections, 2 bacteriophages (P2S2 and P5U5) were selected; host ranges were determined, and phage nucleic acid type and genetic profile were identified via enzymatic digestion. Electron microscopy was used to characterize bacteriophage ultrastructure. Bacteriophage temperature and pH stabilities were assessed by use of double-layer agar overlay titration. A cocultivation assay was used to evaluate the effect of the bacteriophages on bacterial host growth. RESULTS: P5U5 was active against all P aeruginosa isolates, whereas P2S2 formed lytic plaques on plates of 21 (80.8%) isolates. For each bacteriophage, the genomic nucleic acid was DNA; each was genetically distinct. Ultrastructurally, P2S2 and P5U5 appeared likely to belong to the Podoviridae and Siphoviridae families, respectively. The bacteriophages were stable within a pH range of 4 to 12; however, titers of both bacteriophages decreased following heating for 10 to 50 minutes at 45° or 60°C. Growth of each P aeruginosa isolate was significantly inhibited in coculture with P2S2 or P5U5; the dose response was related to the plaque-forming unit-to-CFU ratios. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bacteriophages P2S2 and P5U5 appear to be good candidates for phage treatment of infection caused by pathogenic P aeruginosa in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21801066/