Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How to monitor trilostane treatment in dogs with pituitary disease
By Arenas Bermejo, Carolina et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2020·Anicura Hospital Veterinario Valencia Sur, Spain·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Laboratory assessment of trilostane treatment in dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism (a condition causing excessive cortisol production) were treated with a medication called trilostane. Owners noticed varying responses, with some dogs showing improvement while others remained symptomatic. The study found that common tests used to monitor treatment effectiveness, like cortisol levels and urine tests, did not consistently indicate whether the dogs were receiving the right dose. Ultimately, trilostane was effective in lowering cortisol levels shortly after administration, but the results showed that more reliable monitoring methods are needed to ensure proper dosing.
People also search for: dog Cushing's disease treatment · trilostane for dogs · how to monitor dog cortisol levels
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Results of ACTH stimulation test (ACTHst), pre- and post-trilostane serum cortisol concentrations (SCCs), urine concentration (urine-specific gravity [USG]), and urine cortisol : creatinine ratios (UCCRs) are common variables used to monitor trilostane treatment of dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism (PDH). However, none has consistently discriminated dogs receiving an adequate dose (A) from those overdosed (O) or underdosed (U). OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare recommended monitoring variables, including serial SCCs in a cohort of dogs with PDH treated with trilostane. ANIMALS: Privately owned dogs with PDH (n = 22) and 3 healthy dogs (controls). METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, 2-day study. On day "a" (randomized): ACTHst was completed. Day "b" (>2 to <7 days later): SCCs were assessed -0.5 hours, immediately before, and 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after trilostane administration. On the first study day, urine collected at home was assessed for USG, UCCR and owner opinions regarding PDH were categorized as: A (clinical signs resolved), U (remains symptomatic), or ill (possible O). RESULTS: At 27 pairs of evaluations, 7 dogs were categorized as A, 19 U, and 1 possible O (excluded from the study). There was overlap in SCC results from the A and U dogs at every time point. Results of USG, UCCR, and ACTHst did not discriminate A from U dogs. Trilostane suppresses SCC within 1 hour of administration and its duration of action in most PDH dogs is <8 hours. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: No single variable or group of variables reliably discriminated A dogs from U dogs during trilostane treatment for PDH.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32533623/