PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Topical eye cyclosporine does not affect dog immune cells

By Williams, David L·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2010·Department of Veterinary Medicine, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Lack of effects on lymphocyte function from chronic topical ocular cyclosporine medication: a prospective study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis sicca) were treated with either a 0.2% or 2% topical cyclosporine ointment to see if it affected their immune system. Blood tests showed that none of the dogs had significant levels of cyclosporine in their system, and their immune response remained stable throughout the treatment. This means that using topical cyclosporine for eye issues in dogs is safe and does not appear to cause any harmful side effects. The dogs continued to receive their treatment without any concerning changes in their health.

People also search for: dog dry eye treatment · cyclosporine side effects in dogs · safe eye medication for dogs

Abstract

AIM: Topical cyclosporine has been widely used in the treatment of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca without apparent documented clinical side effects. Thus the finding of reduced lymphocyte proliferation in animals treated with the drug at a concentration of 2% was both surprising and concerning. This study aimed to repeat the previous study and to compare the systemic effects of 2% cyclosporine in corn oil and 0.2% topical cyclosporine ointment (Optimmune, Intervet-Schering Plough, Welwyn, UK). METHODS: Twenty dogs treated with Optimmune or with topical 2% cyclosporine in corn oil where previous treatment with Optimmune had failed were included in this study. Blood samples were taken at the time of first evaluation and at 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment to provide a biochemical and hematological health evaluation of the dogs and at each examination to measure circulating levels of cyclosporine and to obtain a lymphocyte population with which to determine a mitogen stimulation index (MSI) on treatment with phytohaemagglutinin-P (PHA) and conconavlin A (con-A). Levels of circulating cyclosporine were measured with an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay method and also the more sensitive quantification technique of mass spectroscopy (MS). RESULTS: No blood samples contained over 15 ng/ml cyclosporine, the lower limit of detection using the radioimmunoassay or the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. Positive control samples taken from dogs treated with oral cyclosporine for anal furunculosis showed measurable levels in blood, demonstrating that the technique worked. Mean MSI values at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment were 10.2, 11.4, 11.6, and 10.5 for dogs treated with 0.2% cyclosporine and 10.4, 11.9, 11.7, and 12.9 for dogs treated with 2% cyclosporine. Mitogen stimulation index values were not statistically different between the first examination and any subsequent examination time-point. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study contradict those of the previous studies. No change in lymphocyte stimulation index was noted, neither were significant blood levels of cyclosporine documented after topical administration of either 0.2% or 2% cyclosporine. This study shows that topical cyclosporine is safe to use in the canine eye in line with the drug's safety record in this therapeutic regime over the past 20 years since its first use.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20840109/