PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Histamine blockers did not prevent skin allergy in dogs

By Bäumer, Wolfgang et al.·Published in Experimental dermatology·2011·Department of Pharmacology, Germany·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Lack of preventing effect of systemically and topically administered histamine H(1) or H(4) receptor antagonists in a dog model of acute atopic dermatitis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of Maltese-beagle dogs with skin allergies (atopic dermatitis) were tested to see if certain antihistamines could prevent skin lesions after exposure to dust mites. The dogs received either topical or oral treatments with two different histamine receptor blockers, but none of these treatments reduced the skin lesions compared to a placebo. In contrast, a steroid treatment (triamcinolone acetonide) completely prevented any skin lesions from developing. This suggests that antihistamines may not be effective for preventing skin issues in dogs with atopic dermatitis.

People also search for: dog skin allergies treatment · Maltese-beagle atopic dermatitis · antihistamines for dog itching

Abstract

As there is evidence for an anti-inflammatory efficacy of histamine H(4) receptor (H4R) selective antagonists, we aimed at testing the efficacy of the H4R antagonists JNJ7777120 and JNJ28307474 in comparison with histamine H(1) receptor (H1R) antagonists hydroxyzine and cetirizine for skin lesion prevention in a canine model of acute atopic dermatitis. Six atopic Maltese-beagle dogs experimentally sensitized to Dermatophagoides farinae (Df) house dust mites were selected for this study. Twenty-four hours after challenge by epicutaneous application of Df, erythematous skin lesions were scored. In this blinded, placebo and active controlled study, topical JNJ7777120 or JNJ28307474 was applied as a 1% solution before allergen challenge. The latter was also given orally at 15 mg/kg before and after allergen challenge. A 0.015% triamcinolone acetonide solution was used as a positive control. The H1R antagonists hydroxyzine and cetirizine were administered orally before challenge in a second experiment. Twenty-four hours after challenge, placebo-treated animals had a median lesional score of 2. Treatment with topical and oral JNJ28307474 resulted in a median score of 2.5. After topical administration of JNJ7777120, the median lesional score was 2. Hydroxyzine and cetirizine did also not reduce the median score of the placebo treatment. Triamcinolone acetonide prevented all dogs from having any lesions. Determination of histamine in lesions revealed that only during the initiation increased concentrations of histamine were detected. In conclusion, the preventive administration of H1R or H4R antagonists has no impact on the development of acute skin lesions in this experimental canine atopic dermatitis model.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21521369/