PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Laparoscopic-assisted spleen removal surgery in 18 dogs and their

By Wright, Tanya et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2016·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy in dogs: 18 cases (2012-2014).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 18 dogs underwent a minimally invasive surgery called laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy (LAS) to remove a problematic spleen. The surgery was performed to treat issues like splenic masses or suspected tumors. All dogs had successful surgeries with only minor bleeding in one case, and no major complications were reported. The procedure allowed for smaller incisions and better visibility during surgery, which can lead to quicker recovery times for the dogs.

People also search for: dog spleen surgery · laparoscopic splenectomy for dogs · dog splenic mass treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the operative technique and perioperative outcome for laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy (LAS) in dogs. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 18 client-owned dogs. PROCEDURES: Medical records of dogs with naturally occurring disease of the spleen treated by means of LAS between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed. History, signalment, results of physical examination, results of preoperative diagnostic testing, details of surgical technique, intraoperative findings including results of abdominal exploration and staging, concurrent surgical procedures, complications, histopathologic diagnoses, duration of postoperative hospitalization, and perioperative outcome were recorded. The perioperative period was defined as the time from hospital admission for LAS until discharge or death (within the same visit). RESULTS: All dogs underwent initial abdominal exploration and staging via multiple 5-mm laparoscopic ports (n = 2) or a single commercially available multichannel port (16), followed by minilaparotomy with insertion of a wound retraction device, progressive exteriorization of the spleen, sealing of hilar vessels, and splenectomy. Splenectomy was performed for treatment of a splenic mass (n = 15), suspected neoplasia (2), or refractory immune-mediated disease (1). Median size (width × length) of splenic masses was 5 × 5 cm (range, 1.6 to 11.0 cm × 1.5 to 14.5 cm). Complications were limited to minor intraoperative hemorrhage in 1 dog; no patient required conversion to open laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that LAS was technically feasible in dogs and not associated with major complications. Further evaluation is required; however, in appropriately selected patients, LAS may offer the benefits of a minimally invasive technique, including a smaller incision and improved illumination and magnification during exploration and staging.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27031418/