Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Laparoscopic gallbladder removal with single port in 15 dogs
By Simon, Allen & Monnet, Eric·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2020·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Single Port Access System in 15 Dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Fifteen dogs with gallbladder disease underwent a minimally invasive surgery called laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a single port access system. Most surgeries went smoothly, but in a few cases, the procedure had to be converted to a more traditional surgery due to complications. Overall, fourteen dogs were able to go home after surgery, but sadly, one dog passed away later due to severe liver complications. The study suggests that having an experienced surgeon and using an extra cannula at the start of the procedure can help improve outcomes.
People also search for: dog gallbladder surgery recovery · laparoscopic surgery for dogs · symptoms of gallbladder disease in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with a single port access system (SPAS) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: Fifteen client-owned dogs with nonobstructive gallbladder disease. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for signalment, clinical signs, diagnostic imaging, surgical findings, and outcome until suture removal. RESULTS: The SPAS was placed 1 cm caudal to the umbilicus. The procedure was completed with the SPAS alone in two cases. An additional cannula was added in 12 cases. In the last 10 cases, the additional cannula was placed at the beginning of the procedure. Dissection began at the cystic duct in 11 dogs (73%). In three cases (20%), the SPAS procedure was converted to a laparotomy; two of these conversions were elective, and one was emergent. The risk of conversion was affected by the experience of the surgeon (odds ratio = 0.53; P = .0105), and the rate of conversion was reduced when a cannula was added at the beginning of the procedure (P = .022). Fourteen dogs were discharged from the hospital. One dog died after being discharged due to severe cholangiohepatitis, and another dog died due to leakage of a gastrostomy tube. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SPAS for cholecystectomy in dogs has an acceptable outcome. The experience gained by the surgeon and the addition of a cannula reduced the risk of conversion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/IMPACT: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed with a SPAS. The placement of an additional cannula at the beginning of the procedure is highly recommended.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31389068/