Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Laryngeal nerve injury effects on dog vocal fold closure
By Paniello, Randal C et al.·Published in The Laryngoscope·2015·Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Laryngeal adductor function in experimental models of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries was studied to see how well their vocal folds could recover and function after treatment. The results showed that dogs with partial nerve injuries had better recovery of their vocal fold strength compared to those with complete nerve transections. For example, dogs with a 50% nerve cut showed a 108% recovery of their vocal fold function, while those with complete cuts only recovered about 56%. This research suggests that the type of nerve injury significantly affects how well dogs can regain their vocal function after treatment.
People also search for: dog vocal fold paralysis treatment · recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in dogs · dog swallowing problems recovery
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Most patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis experience some degree of spontaneous reinnervation, which depends upon the type and severity of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury. After partial recovery, the paretic vocal fold may or may not adduct adequately to allow glottic closure, which in turn affects phonatory and swallowing outcomes. This process was studied in a series of canine laryngeal nerve injury models. STUDY DESIGN: Animal (canine) experiments. METHODS: Maximum stimulable laryngeal adductor pressure (LAP) was measured pretreatment (baseline) and at 6 months following experimental RLN injuries (total n = 59). The nine study groups were designed to simulate a range of severities of RLN injury. RESULTS: The greatest LAP recovery, at 108% of original baseline, was seen in a 50% transection model; the least recovery was seen when the RLN underwent complete transection with repair, at 56% with precise alignment and 50% with alignment reversed. Intermediate models (partial RLN injuries) gave intermediate results. Crush models recovered 105% of LAP, whereas a half-transection, half-crush injury recovered 72%, and cautery injuries recovered 61%. Controls (complete transection without repair) had no measurable recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The injured RLN has a strong tendency to recover. Restoration of adductor strength, as determined by the LAP, was predictably related to the severity of RLN injury. The model RLN injuries studied provide a range of expected outcomes that can be used for future experiments exploring interventions that may improve postinjury adductor function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25283381/