Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Liposuction removes most lipomas in 20 dogs with few complications
By Hunt, G B et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2011·Veterinary Teaching Hospital, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Liposuction for removal of lipomas in 20 dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 dogs with a total of 76 lipomas (fatty tumors) underwent liposuction to remove these growths. The procedure was successful in 73 out of 76 cases, especially for smaller, well-defined lipomas under 15 cm. However, larger lipomas were more difficult to remove and had a higher chance of complications like bruising and fluid buildup. About 28% of the lipomas regrew within 9 to 36 months after the procedure. Overall, liposuction can be a less invasive option for smaller lipomas, but pet owners should be aware of the possibility of regrowth.
People also search for: dog lipoma treatment · liposuction for dog tumors · why does my dog have lumps · dog fatty tumor removal options
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review the success rates for liposuction of lipomas in dogs, report early complications and medium-term outcomes and formulate recommendations on the most appropriate candidates for liposuction. METHODS: Retrospective study of 20 dogs with 76 lipomas diagnosed by cytology, in which dry liposuction was attempted. Case records were reviewed for number and size of the lipomas, efficacy of liposuction, frequency and types of complication and likelihood of recurrence. RESULTS: Liposuction was successful in removing 73 of 76 lipomas (96%). Simple, encapsulated lipomas less than 15 cm in diameter were most easily removed, with minimal risk of complication. Giant lipomas contained fibrous trabeculae that hindered liposuction and resulted in poor fat retrieval. Giant lipomas were also associated with a high risk of bruising, haematoma and seroma, especially when inguinal in location. Regrowth was noted at follow-up between 9 and 36 months in 28% of lipomas. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Liposuction may be less invasive and more attractive to owners than conventional surgery for lipomas up to 15 cm in diameter. Liposuction is not recommended for infiltrative or giant inguinal lipomas. Regrowth can be expected in a high proportion of lipomas, which should be considered when choosing liposuction over conventional excision.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21797873/