Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Livestock mortality in Afghanistan in districts with and without a veterinary programme.
- Journal:
- Tropical animal health and production
- Year:
- 1996
- Authors:
- Schreuder, B E et al.
- Affiliation:
- DLO-Institute for Animal Science and Health · Netherlands
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how many farm animals died in Afghanistan, where ongoing conflict has disrupted veterinary services. Researchers compared areas with a veterinary program, which included vaccinations and treatments for parasites, to areas without such support. They found that in regions with the veterinary program, fewer young animals like calves, lambs, and kids died compared to those in areas without help. The same was true for adult animals, with lower mortality rates in the areas receiving veterinary care. Overall, the presence of the veterinary program significantly reduced livestock deaths.
Abstract
This paper reports on livestock mortality in Afghanistan where a war has been going on for more than a decade, with complete disruption of the veterinary field services. The study attempted to measure the impact of a veterinary field programme carried out mainly by paravets. The study also provides valuable data on the impact of diseases in the absence of any veterinary intervention. The veterinary programme, implemented by a Dutch non-governmental organisation (NGO) for approximately 3 years, consisted essentially of vaccination against major infectious diseases and administration of anthelmintic drugs for nematodes and liver flukes. Veterinary personnel were also involved in curative treatments. Livestock mortality figures were collected by questionnaire over a period of 2 years from more than 700 farmers in randomly selected villages in 4 covered districts with a veterinary programme and 4 control districts without a veterinary programme. The average annual mortality rates for calves, lambs and kids respectively were 16.2%, 17.3% and 19.1% in the covered areas, against 21.5%, 25.2% and 24.6% in the control areas. Adult mortality figures were 3.8%, 7.4% and 5.4% in the covered areas, against 5.3%, 13.6% and 15.6% in the control areas for cattle, sheep and goats respectively. The survey indicated significant differences (P < 0.01 in cattle, P < 0.001 in small ruminants) in livestock mortality between the control and covered areas and it is concluded that these differences were attributable to the presence or absence of the animal health programme.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8809973/