PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

DNA vaccine treatment effects on melanoma in grey horses

By Mählmann, Kathrin et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2015·Clinic for Horses, Germany·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Local and systemic effect of transfection-reagent formulated DNA vectors on equine melanoma.

Species:
horse
Skin & coatHorses

Plain-English summary

A group of 27 grey horses with melanoma were treated with a new DNA vaccine designed to help fight their skin tumors. The horses received vaccinations on three different occasions, and their tumor sizes were measured over time. By day 120, the size of the tumors had significantly decreased by about 79%. While the vaccine showed promise in reducing tumor size, it did not trigger a strong immune response in the horses. Overall, the treatment appeared to be effective in shrinking the tumors without causing severe side effects.

People also search for: grey horse melanoma treatment · equine melanoma vaccine · horse skin tumor therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Equine melanoma has a high incidence in grey horses. Xenogenic DNA vaccination may represent a promising therapeutic approach against equine melanoma as it successfully induced an immunological response in other species suffering from melanoma and in healthy horses. In a clinical study, twenty-seven, grey, melanoma-bearing, horses were assigned to three groups (n = 9) and vaccinated on days 1, 22, and 78 with DNA vectors encoding for equine (eq) IL-12 and IL-18 alone or in combination with either human glycoprotein (hgp) 100 or human tyrosinase (htyr). Horses were vaccinated intramuscularly, and one selected melanoma was locally treated by intradermal peritumoral injection. Prior to each injection and on day 120, the sizes of up to nine melanoma lesions per horse were measured by caliper and ultrasound. Specific serum antibodies against hgp100 and htyr were measured using cell based flow-cytometric assays. An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements was performed to identify statistically significant influences on the relative tumor volume. For post-hoc testing a Tukey-Kramer Multiple-Comparison Test was performed to compare the relative volumes on the different examination days. An ANOVA for repeated measurements was performed to analyse changes in body temperature over time. A one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate differences in body temperature between the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical tests applied. RESULTS: In all groups, the relative tumor volume decreased significantly to 79.1 &#xb1; 26.91% by day 120 (p < 0.0001, Tukey-Kramer Multiple-Comparison Test). Affiliation to treatment group, local treatment and examination modality had no significant influence on the results (ANOVA for repeated measurements). Neither a cellular nor a humoral immune response directed against htyr or hgp100 was detected. Horses had an increased body temperature on the day after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first clinical report on a systemic effect against equine melanoma following treatment with DNA vectors encoding eqIL12 and eqIL18 and formulated with a transfection reagent. Addition of DNA vectors encoding hgp100 respectively htyr did not potentiate this effect.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25967290/